Walter Scott fatal police shooting case declared mistrial by South Carolina judge

A South Carolina judge declared a mistrial Monday after a jury deadlocked in the murder trial of a white, former police officer charged in the shooting death of an unarmed black motorist.

A panel of one black and 11 white jurors who had seemed close to a verdict to convict on Friday, with apparently only one holdout said Monday they were unable to reach a unanimous decision after deliberating more than 22 hours over four days.

"We as a jury regret to inform the court that despite the best efforts of all parties we are unable to come to a unanimous decision," said Circuit Judge Clifton Newman, reading a note from the jury before declaring a mistrial.

• Walter Scott shooting: Michael Slager subject of prior excessive force complaint
• Walter Scott murder trial opens with nearly all-white jury

Former patrolman MichaelSlagerwas charged with murder in the April 4, 2015 shooting death of 50-year-old Walter Scott. The judge had said the jury could also consider a lesser charge of voluntary manslaughter.

Cellphone video taken by a bystander that showed Scott being shot in the back five times was shown widely in the media and on the internet and shocked the country, inflaming the national debate about how blacks are treated by law enforcement officers.

After the video went public, Slager was fired by the police department and charged with murder. Scott's family called for peace in the North Charleston community. Their calls for calm are believed to have helped prevent the kind of violence that erupted elsewhere when black men were killed in encounters with law enforcement.

Incident renews policing, race debate in U.S.

It's the second time in recent weeks a jury has deadlocked in an officer-involved shooting. A mistrial was declared Nov. 12 when a jury in Cincinnati couldn't reach a verdict in the case of a former campus police officer who was also charged with shooting a black motorist.

There have been similar debates over race and policing in places from New York to Ferguson, Missouri and from Tulsa, Oklahoma to North Carolina.

Slager's wife, Jamie, cried after the jurors were dismissed and briefly put her head on the bench in front of her. She said "thank you for everything" to the defence lawyers as they left the courtroom. She did not respond when reporters asked if she wanted to comment.

One female juror wiped away tears with her hands and a tissue as the attorneys addressed them and thanked them for their hours of work.There were no outbursts in the courtroom.

Scott's mother and brother said outside the courthouse that justice will eventually prevail. "I'm not sad because I know justice will be served," Judy Scott said. Scott's family also called for peaceful protests.

"We're not going to tear up this city," said Scott's brother, Anthony. "We're not happy. But we're not sad."

Asked whether he could forgive Slager, Anthony Scott said he could eventually "find the peace" to forgive the ex-officer but not before justice is served.

"He gets to spend Christmas with his family," he said of Slager.

Solicitor Scarlett Wilson praised Scott's family for their patience and understanding.

"They have not received the credit they deserve in their calm leadership for the community," she said in a statement. "The Scotts have been a sterling example of dignity and grace in extraordinary circumstances."

Slager also faces trial next year in federal court on charges of depriving Scott of his civil rights.

Cellphone video took centre stage at trial

While Slager is white and Scott was black, the video, not the races of the men, dominated the trial.

Scott was pulled over in North Charleston for having a broken taillight on his 1990 Mercedes and then fled the car, running into a vacant lot. Family members have said he may have run because he was worried about going to jail because he was $18,000 USbehind on child support.

The prosecution argued that the 35-year-old Slager let his sense of authority get the better of him.

The defence maintained that the two men wrestled on the ground, that Scott got control of Slager's stun gun and then pointed the weapon at the 35-year-old officer before the shooting. The defence also contended there was no way the officer could tell if Scott was unarmed.

Much of the testimony centred on the cellphone video, which at times was blurry and shaky. The jurors saw thevideo numerous times, including several timesframe-by-frame.

The defence contended that there was much more to the case than the brief video clip that was seen worldwide.

They focused their case on the seconds before the shooting that were not captured on the cellphone video, which was taken by a barber who passed the scene walking to work.

'Scott family has been destroyed,' says Slager

Slager took the stand and testified that Scott wrestled with him and grabbed his Taser and came at him with it. He said he was in "total fear" at the time he fired his gun.

"At that point I pulled my firearm and pulled the trigger," he testified. "I fired until the threat was stopped as I was trained to do."

Slager, who was five-year veteran of the department, also expressed regret over the whole incident.

• 'My mind was like spaghetti': Former officer testifies in fatal shooting trial
• Walter Scott shooting: Former South Carolina officer indicted on federal charges

"My family has been destroyed by it. The Scott family has been destroyed by it. It's horrible," he said.

Last year, the city of North Charleston reached a $6.5 million US civil settlement with Scott's family. In the wake of the shooting, the city also asked that the U.S. Justice Department conduct a review of its police department policies with an eye toward how the department can improve its relationship with residents.