Tech Bytes: Globalive tries the Chewbacca defense? - Action News
Home WebMail Saturday, November 23, 2024, 05:38 PM | Calgary | -11.4°C | Regions Advertise Login | Our platform is in maintenance mode. Some URLs may not be available. |
Tech Bytes: Globalive tries the Chewbacca defense?
Story Tools: PRINT | Text Size: S M L XL | REPORT TYPO | SEND YOUR FEEDBACK

Globalive tries the Chewbacca defense?

By Peter Nowak, CBCNews.ca.

The CRTC kicked off a set of two-day hearings on Globalive's ownership today. The hearings will help the regulator determine whether or not Globalive will get to be Canada's fourth almost-national cellphone company. In its opening remarks, the company put forward a number of reasons why it passes muster as far as Canadian control rules are concerned, but one argument seems to sound like the Chewbacca defense.

The Chewbacca defense is, of course, the infamous defense used by a fictionalized Johnnie Cochrane on an episode of South Park. The cartoon lawyer asked jurors to question why Chewbacca, the eight-foot-tall Wookiee from the Star Wars movies, would choose to live on the forest moon of Endor with a bunch of two-foot-tall Ewoks. Not only did that not make sense, Cochrane said, neither did his bringing it up in court. Therefore, "if Chewbacca lives on Endor, you must acquit."

Globalive's Chewbacca moment came Wednesday morning when its lawyer, Hank Intven, interpreted Canada's foreign control laws for telecommunications companies for the CRTC hearings. According to Intven's prepared statements:

The only question is whether Globalive complies with the requirement that a 'corporation is not otherwise controlled by persons who are not Canadians.' Note that the law does not say that it must be shown that a company is controlled by Canadians but that it is not controlled by non-Canadians.

Hmm. So if the company isn't controlled by non-Canadians or Canadians, who's left to control it? Perhaps Globalive and Intven will clear this up as the hearings continue, but in the meantime it sure sounds like "If the company isn't controlled by Canadians or non-Canadians, you must acquit."

« Previous Post |Main| Next Post »

This discussion is nowOpen. Submit your Comment.

Comments

Vamp

You know honestly this whole crap is going on because Globalive happened to be the one company that opened its ears to hear what THEIR CUSTOMERS WANT, NOT WHAT THE COMPANY GIVES THEM.

The big guns are too damn threatened by this and know that THEY WILL lose their customers. Yeah the whole thing regarding canadian ownership makes sense, and I am all for full Canadian control of a Canadian company but really WTH is being done about Nortel??

Posted September 30, 2009 04:24 PM

« Previous Post |Main| Next Post »

Post a Comment

Disclaimer:

Note: By submitting your comments you acknowledge that CBC has the right to reproduce, broadcast and publicize those comments or any part thereof in any manner whatsoever. Please note that due to the volume of e-mails we receive, not all comments will be published, and those that are published will not be edited. But all will be carefully read, considered and appreciated.

Note: Due to volume there will be a delay before your comment is processed. Your comment will go through even if you leave this page immediately afterwards.

Privacy Policy | Submissions Policy

Story Tools: PRINT | Text Size: S M L XL | REPORT TYPO | SEND YOUR FEEDBACK

World »

302 Found

Found

The document has moved here.

more »

Canada »

302 Found

Found

The document has moved here.

more »

Politics »

302 Found

Found

The document has moved here.

more »

Health »

302 Found

Found

The document has moved here.

more »

Arts & Entertainment»

302 Found

Found

The document has moved here.

more »

Technology & Science »

302 Found

Found

The document has moved here.

more »

Money »

302 Found

Found

The document has moved here.

more »

Consumer Life »

302 Found

Found

The document has moved here.

more »

Sports »

[an error occurred while processing this directive]302 Found

Found

The document has moved here.

more »

Diversions »

[an error occurred while processing this directive]
more »