Home WebMail Friday, November 1, 2024, 10:21 PM | Calgary | -2.2°C | Regions Advertise Login | Our platform is in maintenance mode. Some URLs may not be available. |
Posted: 2021-04-15T16:51:09Z | Updated: 2021-04-15T16:51:09Z

Democrats introduced legislation Thursday to expand the Supreme Court , a symbolic win for progressive groups who have been agitating for court reforms, despite the fact that the bill isnt likely to go anywhere in this Congress.

The bill, introduced by Sen. Ed Markey (D-Mass.) and Reps. Jerrold Nadler (D-N.Y.), Hank Johnson (D-Ga.) and Mondaire Jones (D-N.Y.), would expand the size of the court from nine to 13 seats. They argue that their proposal will restore balance to the Supreme Court after years of Republicans and President Donald Trump politicizing it.

Republicans stole the courts majority with Justice Amy Coney Barretts confirmation, completing their crime spree, Markey said, referring to Trump rushing through confirmation of now-Supreme Court Justice Barrett just weeks before he lost the 2020 presidential election.

That was after then-Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) in 2016 made the unprecedented decision to prevent President Barack Obama from filling a Supreme Court seat with his nominee, Merrick Garland. McConnell and Senate Republicans denied Obama that seat for more than a year, and then let Trump fill it with a conservative pick, now-Supreme Court Justice Neil Gorsuch.

Senate Republicans have politicized the Supreme Court, undermined its legitimacy, and threatened the rights of millions of Americans, especially people of color, women and our immigrant communities, said Markey. This legislation will restore the courts balance and public standing and begin to repair the damage done to our judiciary and democracy.

Heres a copy of their bill, called the Judiciary Act of 2021:

The lawmakers unveiled their bill on the steps of the Supreme Court on Thursday morning, alongside progressive groups including Demand Justice, Indivisible and Take Back the Court.

Nadler, who chairs the House Judiciary Committee, emphasized that its not new to add seats to the Supreme Court to change the balance of its political makeup a practice known as court packing. Its changed seven times in the history of the country, he said.

Some people say were packing the court. Were not packing the court. Were unpacking it, Nadler said. Sen. McConnell and Republicans packed the court over the last couple of years. This is a response to that.

So far, these lawmakers are in the minority in their party on this issue. President Joe Biden isnt a fan of expanding the Supreme Court, and lawmakers dont appear to have any support in House or Senate Democratic leadership.

Asked Thursday if she has any plans to give the Supreme Court expansion bill a vote on the House floor, Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) was brief.

No, she told reporters at her weekly press conference.

Instead, Pelosi lent support to Bidens newly formed commission on court reforms, which will study the issue for six months.

I dont know if thats a good idea or a bad idea, the speaker said of adding seats to the Supreme Court. I think the president is taking the right approach to study such a thing.

But the bills authors seem to be taking the long view that their bill will, eventually, catch on with more Democrats as it becomes more clear what is at stake.

Your Support Has Never Been More Critical

Other news outlets have retreated behind paywalls. At HuffPost, we believe journalism should be free for everyone.

Would you help us provide essential information to our readers during this critical time? We can't do it without you.

You've supported HuffPost before, and we'll be honest we could use your help again . We view our mission to provide free, fair news as critically important in this crucial moment, and we can't do it without you.

Whether you give once or many more times, we appreciate your contribution to keeping our journalism free for all.

You've supported HuffPost before, and we'll be honest we could use your help again . We view our mission to provide free, fair news as critically important in this crucial moment, and we can't do it without you.

Whether you give just one more time or sign up again to contribute regularly, we appreciate you playing a part in keeping our journalism free for all.

Support HuffPost

Pelosi is a very good judge of events, said Nadler, when asked about Pelosis comments on their bill. I believe that as events unfold, as the court comes down with decisions destructive to a womans right to choose, decisions destructive to the climate, as they come down with decisions destructive of civil liberties, I believe that Speaker Pelosi and others will come along.