Taxpayers Still Funding Trump's Court Battle Against Rape Accuser

Taxpayers are continuing to fund Donald Trump s court fight against a woman who accused him of rape and her attorneys are arguing that the Justice Department s involvement is both wrong and dangerous .

Author and journalist E. Jean Carroll accused Trump in a 2019 book of raping her years earlier in a dressing room in a Manhattan department store. Trump called her a liar, adding: Shes not my type. Carroll sued him for defamation.

In a highly controversial move, the DOJ stepped in to defend Trump against the defamation suit, claiming his denunciation of Carroll was part of his official duties . U.S. District Judge Lewis Kaplan , however, blocked the move, ruling last year that Trumps insults had absolutely no relationship to the official business of the United States .

Carrolls attorneys had argued at the time that only in a world gone mad could it somehow be presidential, not personal, for Trump to slander a woman who he sexually assaulted.

Federal attorneys challenged the decision in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 2nd Circuit, and the Justice Department was again blasted in a brief filed with that court Friday on Carrolls behalf.

Carrolls attorney, Roberta Kaplan, again called Trumps comments attacking Carroll purely personal, arguing that there was no legal basis to interpret them as falling within the scope of his official work.

She accused the DOJ of attempting to establish a new rule that would create categorical immunity for any federal official who defames anyone while speaking to the press or responding to perceived critics. ... That rule is both wrong and dangerous, and this Court should reject Appellants effort to avoid answering for Trumps conduct.

Your Support Has Never Been More Critical

Other news outlets have retreated behind paywalls. At HuffPost, we believe journalism should be free for everyone.

Would you help us provide essential information to our readers during this critical time? We can't do it without you.

Can't afford to contribute? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.

You've supported HuffPost before, and we'll be honest we could use your help again . We view our mission to provide free, fair news as critically important in this crucial moment, and we can't do it without you.

Whether you give once or many more times, we appreciate your contribution to keeping our journalism free for all.

Whether you give just one more time or sign up again to contribute regularly, we appreciate you playing a part in keeping our journalism free for all.

Support HuffPost

Allowing the DOJ to defend Trump reflects a disturbing belief that federal officials should have free rein to destroy the reputations and livelihoods of any perceived critic no matter how unrelated to the business of governance, and no matter how personal their motives for doing so, Kaplan argued. That has never been and never should be the law in the United States.

In a statement to Law & Crime, Carroll slammed the DOJs arguments that Trumps attack on her credibility and ugly insults were somehow part of his presidential duties. This is offensive to me. It is offensive to sexual assault survivors everywhere , she said. I hope that it is offensive to the Justice Department under President Biden.

Carroll added: I am confident that the Second Circuit will make it clear that no president, including Donald Trump, can get away scot free with maliciously defaming a woman he sexually assaulted.

CORRECTION: A previous version of this story misidentified Carrolls lawyer. She is a woman named Roberta Kaplan, not a man named Robert Kaplan.

Need help? Visit RAINNs National Sexual Assault Online Hotline or the National Sexual Violence Resource Centers website .