Home WebMail Saturday, November 2, 2024, 02:32 AM | Calgary | -1.1°C | Regions Advertise Login | Our platform is in maintenance mode. Some URLs may not be available. |
Posted: 2022-02-22T23:54:51Z | Updated: 2022-02-22T23:54:51Z

NEW YORK (AP) A lawyer for a woman who accused former President Donald Trump of raping her in the mid-1990s and then filed a defamation lawsuit against him said Tuesday she will not seek to depose Trump prior to trial because it would cause unnecessary delay, but she added that a DNA sample was still being sought.

Attorney Roberta Kaplan first made the revelation in Manhattan federal court during a pretrial hearing before explaining the decision to reporters outside court as her client, E. Jean Carroll, stood by her side.

A deposition, Kaplan said, would inevitably result in an inordinate amount of delay.

We want the case to go forward, she said.

Attorney Alina Habba, who represented Trump at the hearing, said outside court that she had not heard before that Carrolls lawyers did not want a deposition, a proceeding in which lawyers in civil cases question likely witnesses under oath prior to trial.

Its surprising, Habba said.

As for a DNA sample, Habba said: None has been demanded.

Kaplan, though, said the DNA sample had been requested after the case was first filed in state court and the demand still exists after it was moved to federal court.

The Associated Press generally does not identify people alleging sexual assault, but Carroll has consented to being named in the media.

She told reporters outside court that she was looking forward to the trial on behalf of all women who have been grabbed and groped, assaulted and raped by men in power and are silenced.

And we are looking to bring justice, at least in this one case, against a powerful man, she said.

Carroll said she would never settle, never.

This is about principle. Its about a powerful man assaulting and raping a woman and then getting away with it. Thats not right, she said.

Carroll in a June 2019 book said Trump raped her in the mid-1990s in an upscale Manhattan department store.

The book excerpt prompted Trump to deny the allegations and question Carrolls credibility and motivations in a statement from his White House press office, comments in an Oval Office interview and statements to the media as he boarded a helicopter for Camp David.

The 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals is expected to rule eventually on Trumps request to be replaced as the defendant in the lawsuit by the United States.

Your Support Has Never Been More Critical

Other news outlets have retreated behind paywalls. At HuffPost, we believe journalism should be free for everyone.

Would you help us provide essential information to our readers during this critical time? We can't do it without you.

You've supported HuffPost before, and we'll be honest we could use your help again . We view our mission to provide free, fair news as critically important in this crucial moment, and we can't do it without you.

Whether you give once or many more times, we appreciate your contribution to keeping our journalism free for all.

You've supported HuffPost before, and we'll be honest we could use your help again . We view our mission to provide free, fair news as critically important in this crucial moment, and we can't do it without you.

Whether you give just one more time or sign up again to contribute regularly, we appreciate you playing a part in keeping our journalism free for all.

Support HuffPost

The U.S. Justice Department has asserted that Trump cannot be held personally liable for crude and disrespectful remarks he made about Carroll because he was president at the time.

Judge Lewis A. Kaplan, who presided over Tuesdays hearing, ruled last October that Trump cannot use a law protecting federal employees from being sued individually for things they do within the scope of their employment.

He also has rejected a request by Trumps attorneys that the progression of the lawsuit, including depositions, be delayed until the 2nd Circuit rules on whether Trump can be replaced as the defendant.