Home WebMail Friday, November 1, 2024, 11:25 AM | Calgary | -4.5°C | Regions Advertise Login | Our platform is in maintenance mode. Some URLs may not be available. |
Posted: 2013-06-11T12:40:40Z | Updated: 2013-06-11T16:26:08Z

What might humans look like in the distant future?

Nickolay Lamm , a Pittsburgh-based artist, has created four sci-fi-like illustrations showing one idea of what changes to the human genome may do to the human face 20,000 years, 60,000 years, and 100,000 years hence. The images are based on hypotheses put forth by Dr. Alan Kwan , an expert on computational genomics.

So, just how might we look? Pretty darn freaky, if you agree with the illustrations -- and not everyone seems so quick to do that.

(story continues below)

Research from the University of Birmingham in England has suggested that the foreheads of modern-day humans are higher than those of people who lived during medieval times . Lamm's illustrations show a continuation of this trend. And according to Dr. Kwan, as humans learn to manipulate our own DNA, we may be able to select traits that we deem desirable.

"Our future selves will ultimately control human biology and human evolution the way we control the flow of electrons through our electronics today," Kwan told The Huffington Post in an email. "In this potential future, humankind has wrested control of the human form from natural evolution and are able to bend human biology to human needs."

In the distant future, Kwan said, humans might want to have bigger eyes in order to work better in the low-light environments of space. In addition, thicker eyelids might protect our eyes from the curious effect of cosmic rays in space.

"For what its worth, I think Lamms work is conceptually cool, but wanted to get on-the-record that this is dreaming, not science," Matthew Herper wrote in Forbes, adding that the images had caused a stir among some scientists and science communicators.

Your Support Has Never Been More Critical

Other news outlets have retreated behind paywalls. At HuffPost, we believe journalism should be free for everyone.

Would you help us provide essential information to our readers during this critical time? We can't do it without you.

You've supported HuffPost before, and we'll be honest we could use your help again . We view our mission to provide free, fair news as critically important in this crucial moment, and we can't do it without you.

Whether you give once or many more times, we appreciate your contribution to keeping our journalism free for all.

You've supported HuffPost before, and we'll be honest we could use your help again . We view our mission to provide free, fair news as critically important in this crucial moment, and we can't do it without you.

Whether you give just one more time or sign up again to contribute regularly, we appreciate you playing a part in keeping our journalism free for all.

Support HuffPost

The Huffington Post reached out to biologist Dr. Mark Siegal, an associate professor at New York University, to get his thoughts on the matter, but he declined: "Sorry, but I find this so far outside the realm of evolutionary biology that I'd rather not comment."

Update: Kwan told The Huffington Post in an email, "Mark Siegal is correct, our speculation envisions a future where evolution will continue to determine human face and body for about 50,000 years, but sometime during that time, human understanding and genomic engineering technologies will overtake natural evolution in determining human physiology."