Home WebMail Friday, November 1, 2024, 10:34 PM | Calgary | -2.2°C | Regions Advertise Login | Our platform is in maintenance mode. Some URLs may not be available. |
Posted: 2018-11-29T20:38:53Z | Updated: 2018-11-29T21:03:48Z

WASHINGTON For decades, House Republicans have wanted stricter rules for food stamp recipients and this year seemed like their chance to finally make those provisions a reality.

Republicans control the House, Senate, and White House. They have broad support in their party for tougher food stamp rules. And President Donald Trump, not usually known for policy detail, has tweeted about the need for new work requirements five times.

So it may come as a bit of a shock in the coming weeks when Republicans put forward a final farm bill compromise that does not include the GOPs signature goal.

Senate Agriculture Committee chairman Pat Roberts (R-Kan.) said Thursday that the final version of the legislation will not have the tougher work rules Trump and House Speaker Paul Ryan (R-Wis.) had sought for the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program.

We took a more comprehensive approach to provide program integrity, as opposed to extending age limits to moms that have kids that are 8 years old, so on and so forth, Roberts told HuffPost.

Over the summer, the Senate passed a bipartisan farm bill that included modest anti-fraud provisions, while the House passed a Republican-only bill with new rules that would have reduced program enrollment by more than 1 million over 10 years.

More than 38 million Americans receive monthly SNAP benefits that can be used only to buy food in grocery stores. The program already has work requirements for the subset of recipients who are able-bodied adults without minor children. The House bill would have applied the requirements to parents of children older than 6 and unemployed adults in their 50s, who had previously been exempt.

Your Support Has Never Been More Critical

Other news outlets have retreated behind paywalls. At HuffPost, we believe journalism should be free for everyone.

Would you help us provide essential information to our readers during this critical time? We can't do it without you.

You've supported HuffPost before, and we'll be honest we could use your help again . We view our mission to provide free, fair news as critically important in this crucial moment, and we can't do it without you.

Whether you give once or many more times, we appreciate your contribution to keeping our journalism free for all.

You've supported HuffPost before, and we'll be honest we could use your help again . We view our mission to provide free, fair news as critically important in this crucial moment, and we can't do it without you.

Whether you give just one more time or sign up again to contribute regularly, we appreciate you playing a part in keeping our journalism free for all.

Support HuffPost

The Senate GOP was never as gung-ho as the House about requiring work for food assistance, knowing a farm bill would eventually need Democratic support in order to get the requisite 60 votes in the Senate for passage. But it hasnt been totally clear at any point during negotiations that Republicans would give in to the Senates provisions rather than just do a short-term extension and try to cut food stamps another day.

The House and Senate need to agree on a final compromise bill before any changes can become law. Roberts and several other members of the committee negotiating the final version said Thursday they were basically adopting the Senate version of the SNAP part of the legislation. But they declined to offer more specific details, saying they were waiting for the Congressional Budget Office to review the bills various titles. Roberts said that the language of the bill could still change if members dont like the cost estimates.

Im told Ill be happy, but I want to verify before I make any conclusive comment, said Rep. Jim McGovern (D-Ma.), one of SNAPs strongest defenders in the House.