Home WebMail Friday, November 1, 2024, 06:34 AM | Calgary | -3.8°C | Regions Advertise Login | Our platform is in maintenance mode. Some URLs may not be available. |
Posted: 2022-08-07T19:19:10Z | Updated: 2022-08-07T19:51:31Z

WASHINGTON After a year of painstaking negotiations that seemed for a time to be going nowhere, Senate Democrats on Sunday approved sweeping legislation aiming to reduce the nations output of greenhouse gases and make health care more affordable.

The vote was split 50-50 along party lines, with Vice President Kamala Harris casting the tie-breaker after a marathon session of votes on amendments. The House is expected to take up the legislation and pass it on Friday.

Democrats celebrated after the bill passed by roaring in applause and hugging one another on the Senate floor. Aides who were intimately involved in negotiations wiped away tears in jubilation.

Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) said the bill would endure as one of the defining legislative feats of the 21st century.

The Inflation Reduction Act while substantially narrowed from prior versions is now poised to give President Joe Biden another major legislative victory ahead of Novembers midterm elections. Its given name is a reflection of the shaky politics for his party at the moment, with rising costs of food, gasoline and energy at the top of voters minds.

The bill would make broad changes in energy, drug and tax policies. Prior to some last-minute changes caused by procedural issues, the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office estimated the bill would cut the budget deficit by a little more than $90 billion over 10 years.

Democrats also claim another $200 billion in deficit reduction from the revenues that the government would collect from tougher IRS enforcement.

The bill sets aside hundreds of billions of dollars to fight climate change, including through incentivizing clean energy technology. Senate Finance Committee Chairman Ron Wyden (D-Ore.) said $260 billion would go toward clean energy tax credits that he called transformational.

The bill would also enact a change Democrats have sought for more than a decade to allow Medicare to negotiate with drug companies over the prices of prescription drugs. That kind of haggling was outlawed in the 2003 Part D prescription drug benefit bill passed by Republicans.

A separate provision of the legislation would extend a temporary set of subsidies for the Affordable Care Act that reduce the price of insurance that people buy directly through HealthCare.gov, or through state-run insurance exchanges like Pennsylvanias Pennie and Connect for Health Care Colorado. For some insurance buyers, the subsidies lead to savings of hundreds or even thousands of dollars a year.

The subsidies, which Democrats enacted in 2021 as part of their pandemic relief package, were set to expire this year. The Inflation Reduction Act has them staying in place through 2025.

On taxes, the bill would put in place a 15% minimum corporate tax and beef up IRS enforcement to the tune of $80 billion over the next 10 years.

Democrats had initially hoped to pass a much broader social policy bill, but couldnt get Sen. Joe Manchin (D-W.Va.) on board with things like paid leave, affordable housing and child care. After months of stalled talks that left progressives steaming, Manchin shocked Washington by agreeing to a deal with Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) on a narrower package, and angering Republicans who believed he had driven the final nail in the coffin.

Democrats eventually won over Sen. Kyrsten Sinema (D-Ariz.), their last holdout, by agreeing to make several changes to the bill, including eliminating a provision that would have tightened a tax loophole associated with hedge fund managers and private equity executives. That measure was replaced with a new excise tax on stock buybacks slated to begin in 2023.

Through Saturday night, Republicans did their best to extract a political cost for Democrats in passing the bill making them vote on a series of ticklish amendments intended less to be adopted than to give Democratic Senate candidates nightmares about the ads they could spawn.

Sen. Susan Collins (R-Maine) offered an amendment that would have prohibited the IRS from accessing its additional money in the bill until 90% of the agencys employees were back to work in person. It failed on a 50-50 vote. A proposed amendment by Sen. Mike Crapo (R-Idaho) that would have prohibited the new IRS funds from being used to audit taxpayers with taxable incomes of less than $400,000 annually the level below which Biden said people would not see any tax hikes was also defeated in a 50-50 tie.

Other proposed Republican amendments aimed to put in place proposals that Democrats said they supported but that were not included in the bill, like a revamp of environmental permitting requirements and opening up Outer Continental Shelf areas for energy exploration. They were defeated by a 49-50 procedural vote and a 50-50 tally, respectively.

My R[epublican] friends have made clear theyre completely unwilling to support this bill under any condition. None of their amendments would change that. For this reason, Ill vote to protect the integrity of the IRA regardless of the substance of their fake amendments, Manchin tweeted Saturday, pledging to stick with Democrats in brushing back the GOPs efforts.

Not all of the defeated amendments were from Republicans, though. Senate Democrats stuck to their plan to avoid upsetting the bills delicate balance with any on-the-fly changes meaning that proposed amendments offered by Senate Budget Chairman Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.), which would have expanded health care benefits, were defeated on 1-99, 3-97 and 1-98 votes.

Democrats though supportive of that effort voted those amendments down since their adoption would have increased the overall cost of the package and lost them the support of Manchin.

Senator Sanders is right, Sen. Sherrod Brown (D-Ohio) said after Sanders proposed an amendment to extend a monthly child allowance. But I ask my colleagues to vote no, because this would bring the bill down.

Democratic attempts to introduce a $35 cap on insulin prices also failed, because the Senate parliamentarian concluded that the provision violated the complex rules that govern legislation moving through the reconciliation process. Democrats sought to include the measure in the bill anyway, but Republicans voted to strip it out.

The final bill was a patchwork that some senators only grudgingly supported.

Sanders on Saturday stepped on Democrats messaging by echoing GOP complaints that the bill would not rein in inflation. He labeled it the so-called Inflation Reduction Act, to the delight of the Republican National Committee .

Republicans were backed up Thursday by the head of the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office, Phillip Swagel. At the request of Sen. Lindsey Graham (S.C.), the top Republican on the Senate Budget Committee, Swagel offered his opinion of the inflation-fighting impact of the bill and said it would be negligible in 2022. In 2023, it would result in inflation being only 0.1 percentage point lower or higher than under current law, he said.

But Democratic leaders said that analysis failed to account for health and energy rebates in the bill. They also vowed to fight for the rest of their agenda in the coming months.

There are people who want to do more, Wyden told reporters on Saturday. I share that view. It wasnt on offer tonight. Couldnt get 50 votes.

Your Support Has Never Been More Critical

Other news outlets have retreated behind paywalls. At HuffPost, we believe journalism should be free for everyone.

Would you help us provide essential information to our readers during this critical time? We can't do it without you.

You've supported HuffPost before, and we'll be honest we could use your help again . We view our mission to provide free, fair news as critically important in this crucial moment, and we can't do it without you.

Whether you give once or many more times, we appreciate your contribution to keeping our journalism free for all.

You've supported HuffPost before, and we'll be honest we could use your help again . We view our mission to provide free, fair news as critically important in this crucial moment, and we can't do it without you.

Whether you give just one more time or sign up again to contribute regularly, we appreciate you playing a part in keeping our journalism free for all.

Support HuffPost

And Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) on Sunday touted the investments in green energy in the bill.

This will matter enormously to tens of millions of people across the country, Warren said. This is Americas first real push to fight back in the climate crisis.