What Happened To Jason Chaffetz's Backbone? | HuffPost Latest News

At a recent town hall event in Cottonwood, Utah, Rep. Jason Chaffetz (R-Utah) got a chance to hear from his constituents, and they gave him an earful . Over the course of the evening, Chaffetz was subjected to a torrent of ire from crowds repeatedly chanting Do your job! a reference, of course, to Chaffetzs role as chairman of the House Oversight Committee, where its up to him to make sure President Donald Trump uses his office as the Constitution intended, and not as a vehicle for self-enrichment.

Chaffetz has since attempted to portray those protesters as paid outside agitators. Its a strange stance to take with his constituents, since if hes wrong, theyll remember and indeed, no one has been able to find evidence for this bizarre claim . Of course, Chaffetz has another option here; he could, simply and as requested by the people who pay his salary, do his job. Its a job that he used to do quite zealously, until Trump came around. Now, the man who once relished his role as an attack dog has opted for a self-neutering.

\r\n\r\n","

\r\n\r\n"],"adCount":0},"isCollectionEmbed":false,"enhancements":{},"defer":true,"addPlaceholder":false}">

This has been especially apparent these past few days. As questions swirl about recently cashiered national security adviser Michael Flynn and his communications with Russias ambassador to the United States, Sergey Kislyak questions with potentially grave national security implications Chaffetz is telling reporters that the situation has taken care of itself.

In reality, the situation is still very much unfolding . Its true that Intelligence Committee, not Oversight, has jurisdiction over the matter, but its still remarkable to hear Chaffetz downplay recent events. Hes announced that he will get to the bottom of whatever went down at Mar-a-Lago last weekend although it hardly takes a genius to deduce what happened.

Chaffetz has maintained that the president is not bound by conflicts-of-interest laws. While this is technically true, the president is bound by the emoluments clause of the Constitution . More broadly, the fact that the president is not subject to conflicts-of-interest laws really means that he or she is obliged to go above and beyond in setting a strong ethical tone for the White House because everyone else in the administration will follow their boss lead.

This was only recently put to the test in a way that actually forced Chaffetz to evince some alarm. Last week, Trump aide-de-camp Kellyanne Conway went on Fox & Friends and urged viewers to purchase items from Ivanka Trumps clothing line. This was an absolute violation of an Office Of Government Ethics regulation barring White House staff from endorsing products . The OGE, having learned about Conways actions , contacted the White House .

For a brief, mad moment, Chaffetz remembered that he was from a proud species of vertebrates, telling reporters that Conways actions were over the line and that it should never have happened, and [the White House] better learn this lesson very quick.

Chaffetz was essentially ignoring the fact that Conway was only following the example of Trump, who had tweeted in support of his elder daughters business interests as well. Its really no wonder that Conway, even after she was supposedly counseled, felt free to announce that the president supports me 100 percent. And if you were wondering if Conway felt any remorse over her ethics violation, she made it clear on Twitter that she did not:

I learned important lessons this week. This one was my favorite.

P.S. He likes \"counselor\" more than \"counseled\".

Thank you, sir. https://t.co/UVMKCimD8C

Kellyanne Conway (@KellyannePolls) February 11, 2017","type":"rich","meta":{"author":"Kellyanne Conway","author_url":"https://twitter.com/KellyannePolls","cache_age":86400,"description":"I learned important lessons this week. This one was my favorite. P.S. He likes "counselor" more than "counseled". Thank you, sir. https://t.co/UVMKCimD8C— Kellyanne Conway (@KellyannePolls) February 11, 2017\n","provider_name":"Twitter","title":"Kellyanne Conway on Twitter","type":"rich","url":"https://twitter.com/KellyannePolls/status/830205720817782785","version":"1.0"},"flags":[],"fullBleed":false,"options":{"theme":"news","device":"mobile","editionInfo":{"id":"us","name":"U.S.","link":"https://action.news","locale":"en_US"},"originalEdition":"us","isMapi":false,"isAmp":false,"isVideoEntry":false,"isEntry":true,"isMt":false,"entryId":"58a36191e4b03df370daf09d","entryPermalink":"https://action.news/entry/jason-chaffetz-trump_n_58a36191e4b03df370daf09d","entryTagsList":"donald-trump,us-news,us-presidential-elections,republican-politics,political-science,eat-the-press,ivanka-trump,trump-organization,jason-chaffetz,michael-flynn,conflict-of-interest,house-oversight-committee,emoluments-clause,@health_depression,@health_gad,@health_ibs,@health_models","sectionSlug":"politics","deptSlug":"politics-news","sectionRedirectUrl":null,"subcategories":"","isWide":false,"headerOverride":null,"noVideoAds":false,"disableFloat":false,"isNative":false,"commercialVideo":{"provider":"custom","site_and_category":"us.politics","package":null},"isHighline":false,"vidibleConfigValues":{"cid":"60afc111dcf87c2cd2f5d8bf","overrides":{"front_page_top_videos":{"desktop":"60b64354b171b7444beaff4d","mobileweb":"60b64354b171b7444beaff4d"},"top_media":{"desktop":"60b8e6bdc5449357a7ada147","mobile":"60b8e701c5449357a7ada2ee","iphone":"60b8e643cdd90620331bb1f6","ipad":"60b8e643cdd90620331bb1f6","androidphone":"60b8e699c5449357a7ada04c","androidtablet":"60b8e699c5449357a7ada04c"},"anthology":{"desktop":"60b8e616cdd90620331bb0ba","mobile":"60b8e671c5449357a7ad9f66","iphone":"60b8e643cdd90620331bb1f6","ipad":"60b8e643cdd90620331bb1f6","androidphone":"60b8e699c5449357a7ada04c","androidtablet":"60b8e699c5449357a7ada04c"},"content":{"desktop":"60b8e616cdd90620331bb0ba","mobile":"60b8e671c5449357a7ad9f66","iphone":"60b8e643cdd90620331bb1f6","ipad":"60b8e643cdd90620331bb1f6","androidphone":"60b8e699c5449357a7ada04c","androidtablet":"60b8e699c5449357a7ada04c"}},"playerUpdates":{"5668ae6ee4b0b5e26955d6a6":"60d2472d9340d7032ad7e443","56aa41bae4b091744c0440d8":"60e869dc7c5f3b17b6741b81","5841b2b5cc52c716ec6e5a7f":"60b8e355cdd90620331ba185","58b5e2b8d85a10302feee895":"60b64316b171b7444beafdb2","58b74698f78ced31417819ae":"60b8e5bec5449357a7ad9b52","58b74ccecebcea57e2c3a3d1":"60b8e5eac5449357a7ad9ca5","58cff690d85a100b9992bc39":"60b8e616cdd90620331bb0ba","58cffb3fb6d9b972a49a3c9d":"60b8e643cdd90620331bb1f6","58cffdd74d96935d7d6ec180":"60b8e671c5449357a7ad9f66","58d03a84f78ced6518eb2fa7":"60b643c82e76be41f112735c","592edf20e0fa177b0c26f7fd":"60b8e699c5449357a7ada04c","5b35266b158f855373e28256":"60b64354b171b7444beaff4d","5c116f29f79c4171d82b7c2a":"60b64440b171b7444beb040b","5c1170fc600c9a697bf0c6b9":"60b646102e76be41f1127ffc","5c47791afa1b317df8ae0c4f":"60b8e6bdc5449357a7ada147","5c477987a6b48b35f164773d":"60b8e701c5449357a7ada2ee","5c4779ee943c3c2a64f28371":"60b8e747cdd90620331bb861","5c477a26fcd67b26879bc7c2":"60b8e788c5449357a7ada67b","5d8921a78c3ae845f366c9b6":"60ae7be5f3a7c13a30417ff9","58b98b00ba82aa39a6534321":"60d0de7c9340d7032ad1146c","58b9d14cb6d9b96c9ec32af3":"60d0dec19340d7032ad115a0","58cff8eccebcea42931e0436":"60d0e005b627221e9d819d44","592edf5de0fa177b0c26f95b":"60d0e38fb627221e9d81adcf","58cff72fd85a100b9992c112":"60d0e447b627221e9d81b0da","56b4d34fe4b022697697c400":"60d2472d9340d7032ad7e443","60b8e4c0c5449357a7ad957d":"60e869dc7c5f3b17b6741b81"}},"connatixConfigValues":{"defaultPlayer":"ff7fdddc-5441-4253-abc4-f12a33fad58b","clickToPlayPlayer":"d014396e-b366-4c17-aeac-3ce906fa3fd0","videoPagePlayer":"f010447b-d244-4111-a314-7b4542ae4145","verticalPlayer":"e58cb05a-0bc8-4210-9108-fea82726c065","stickyPlayerControl":"52ea1755-d601-4ad1-bccc-d8cce3f0e5da","stickyPlayerON":"8055e9e5-3bda-4933-8d45-9ad814fb6e22"},"topConnatixThumnbailSrc":"","customAmpComponents":[],"ampAssetsUrl":"https://amp.assets.huffpost.com","videoTraits":null,"positionInUnitCounts":{"buzz_head":{"count":0},"buzz_body":{"count":0},"buzz_bottom":{"count":0}},"positionInSubUnitCounts":{"article_body":{"count":24},"blog_summary":{"count":0},"before_you_go_content":{"count":0}},"connatixCountsHelper":{"count":1},"buzzfeedTracking":{"context_page_id":"58a36191e4b03df370daf09d","context_page_type":"buzz","destination":"huffpost","mode":"mobile","page_edition":"en-us"},"tags":[{"name":"Donald Trump","slug":"donald-trump","links":{"relativeLink":"topic/donald-trump","permalink":"https://action.news/topic/donald-trump","mobileWebLink":"https://action.news/topic/donald-trump"},"relegenceId":2789214,"department":{"name":"Latest News","slug":"politics-news"},"section":{"title":"Politics","slug":"politics"},"topic":{"title":"Donald Trump","slug":"donald-trump","overridesSectionLabel":false},"url":"https://action.news/news/topic/donald-trump"},{"name":"U.S. News","slug":"us-news","links":{"relativeLink":"topic/us-news","permalink":"https://action.news/topic/us-news","mobileWebLink":"https://action.news/topic/us-news"},"relegenceSubjectId":981465,"department":{"name":"Latest News","slug":"politics-news"},"section":{"title":"World News","slug":"world-news"},"topic":{"title":"United States","slug":"united-states","overridesSectionLabel":false},"url":"https://action.news/news/topic/united-states"},{"name":"u.s. presidential elections","slug":"us-presidential-elections","links":{"relativeLink":"topic/us-presidential-elections","permalink":"https://action.news/topic/us-presidential-elections","mobileWebLink":"https://action.news/topic/us-presidential-elections"},"relegenceSubjectId":6258423,"department":{"name":"Latest News","slug":"politics-news"},"section":{"title":"Politics","slug":"politics"},"topic":{"title":"Elections 2016","slug":"elections-2016","overridesSectionLabel":false},"url":"https://action.news/news/topic/elections-2016"},{"name":"Republican Politics","slug":"republican-politics","links":{"relativeLink":"topic/republican-politics","permalink":"https://action.news/topic/republican-politics","mobileWebLink":"https://action.news/topic/republican-politics"},"relegenceSubjectId":4944927,"department":{"name":"Latest News","slug":"politics-news"},"section":{"title":"Politics","slug":"politics"},"topic":{"title":"Republican Party","slug":"republican-party","overridesSectionLabel":false},"url":"https://action.news/news/topic/republican-party"},{"name":"political science","slug":"political-science","links":{"relativeLink":"topic/political-science","permalink":"https://action.news/topic/political-science","mobileWebLink":"https://action.news/topic/political-science"},"relegenceSubjectId":982061,"url":"https://action.news/topic/political-science"},{"name":"Eat The Press","slug":"eat-the-press","links":{"relativeLink":"topic/eat-the-press","permalink":"https://action.news/topic/eat-the-press","mobileWebLink":"https://action.news/topic/eat-the-press"},"department":{"name":"Latest News","slug":"politics-news"},"section":{"title":"Politics","slug":"politics"},"topic":{"title":"Eat The Press","slug":"eat-the-press","overridesSectionLabel":false},"url":"https://action.news/news/topic/eat-the-press"},{"name":"ivanka trump","slug":"ivanka-trump","links":{"relativeLink":"topic/ivanka-trump","permalink":"https://action.news/topic/ivanka-trump","mobileWebLink":"https://action.news/topic/ivanka-trump"},"relegenceId":3705475,"department":{"name":"Latest News","slug":"politics-news"},"section":{"title":"Politics","slug":"politics"},"topic":{"title":"Ivanka Trump","slug":"ivanka-trump","overridesSectionLabel":false},"url":"https://action.news/news/topic/ivanka-trump"},{"name":"trump organization","slug":"trump-organization","links":{"relativeLink":"topic/trump-organization","permalink":"https://action.news/topic/trump-organization","mobileWebLink":"https://action.news/topic/trump-organization"},"relegenceId":3811449,"department":{"name":"Latest News","slug":"politics-news"},"section":{"title":"Politics","slug":"politics"},"topic":{"title":"Donald Trump","slug":"donald-trump","overridesSectionLabel":false},"url":"https://action.news/news/topic/donald-trump"},{"name":"jason chaffetz","slug":"jason-chaffetz","links":{"relativeLink":"topic/jason-chaffetz","permalink":"https://action.news/topic/jason-chaffetz","mobileWebLink":"https://action.news/topic/jason-chaffetz"},"relegenceId":4143620,"department":{"name":"Latest News","slug":"politics-news"},"section":{"title":"Politics","slug":"politics"},"topic":{"title":"Jason Chaffetz","slug":"jason-chaffetz","overridesSectionLabel":false},"url":"https://action.news/news/topic/jason-chaffetz"},{"name":"michael flynn","slug":"michael-flynn","links":{"relativeLink":"topic/michael-flynn","permalink":"https://action.news/topic/michael-flynn","mobileWebLink":"https://action.news/topic/michael-flynn"},"department":{"name":"Latest News","slug":"politics-news"},"section":{"title":"Politics","slug":"politics"},"topic":{"title":"Michael Flynn","slug":"michael-flynn","overridesSectionLabel":false},"url":"https://action.news/news/topic/michael-flynn"},{"name":"conflict of interest","slug":"conflict-of-interest","links":{"relativeLink":"topic/conflict-of-interest","permalink":"https://action.news/topic/conflict-of-interest","mobileWebLink":"https://action.news/topic/conflict-of-interest"},"url":"https://action.news/topic/conflict-of-interest"},{"name":"House Oversight Committee","slug":"house-oversight-committee","links":{"relativeLink":"topic/house-oversight-committee","permalink":"https://action.news/topic/house-oversight-committee","mobileWebLink":"https://action.news/topic/house-oversight-committee"},"department":{"name":"Latest News","slug":"politics-news"},"section":{"title":"Politics","slug":"politics"},"topic":{"title":"House Oversight Committee","slug":"house-oversight-committee","overridesSectionLabel":false},"url":"https://action.news/news/topic/house-oversight-committee"},{"name":"Emoluments Clause","slug":"emoluments-clause","links":{"relativeLink":"topic/emoluments-clause","permalink":"https://action.news/topic/emoluments-clause","mobileWebLink":"https://action.news/topic/emoluments-clause"},"url":"https://action.news/topic/emoluments-clause"}],"isLiveblogLive":null,"isLiveblog":false,"cetUnit":"buzz_body","bodyAds":["

\r\n\r\n","

\r\n\r\n"],"adCount":0},"isCollectionEmbed":false,"enhancements":{}}">

I learned important lessons this week. This one was my favorite.

P.S. He likes "counselor" more than "counseled".

Thank you, sir. https://t.co/UVMKCimD8C
Kellyanne Conway (@KellyannePolls) February 11, 2017

One could call this a demonstration of pure contempt for Jason Chaffetz, except Chaffetz himself has gone out of his way to invite this contempt. In his one post-inauguration meeting with Trump, Chaffetz was told that the topic of oversight was not to be brought up . Had it been discussed, of course, the whole imbroglio over Conways promotion of Ivanka Trumps clothing might have been avoided.

Chaffetzs sudden lack of zeal is noteworthy. While hes griping these days about people calling for fishing expeditions , it wasnt long ago that he was telling anyone whod listen that he was hard at work prepping his lures. Back when it seemed certain that former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton would become president and during those few hours that Chaffetz had unendorsed Trump, citing his daughters honor the Oversight chairman was loudly bragging about his plans to pepper the Clinton White House with investigations. As The Washington Posts David Weigel reported in October :

Jason Chaffetz, the Utah congressman wrapping up his first term atop the powerful House Oversight Committee, unendorsed Donald Trump weeks ago. That freed him up to prepare for something else: spending years, come January, probing the record of a President Hillary Clinton.
Its a target-rich environment, the Republican said in an interview in Salt Lake Citys suburbs. Even before we get to Day One, weve got two years worth of material already lined up. She has four years of history at the State Department, and it aint good.

And during the Obama administration, Chaffetz was more than willing to escalate the threat level where the White House was concerned. As CNN reported in May 2013 :

Rep. Jason Chaffetz reiterated Tuesday that the impeachment of President Barack Obama is possible as the White House faces scrutiny over its role in responding to the terror attack on a U.S. diplomatic post in Benghazi, Libya.
Look, its not something Im seeking, the Republican congressman from Utah said on CNNs The Situation Room with Wolf Blitzer. Its not the endgame; its not what were playing for. I was simply asked, is that within the realm of possibilities, and I would say yes. Im not willing to take that off the table. But thats certainly not what were striving for.

Where did the passion go? At last weeks town hall in Cottonwood, Chaffetz told his constituents that he plans to take a wait-and-see approach to the river of potential emolument violations running through the White House. As Think Progress Laurel Raymond reported :

Before boos cut him off, Chaffetz also said that he wont investigate the ways that Trump might personally profit from the presidency until theres evidence that Trump has used his legal exemption from conflicts of interest to benefit his family. Politico reported Thursday that Trump has already received his first payment from a foreign government, the Saudis, for a room at his DC hotel.

In addition to the self-enrichment hes already notched from the Saudis, its been reported that the Trump Organization is reviving a long-dormant licensing deal involving a beachfront luxury resort in the Dominican Republic, contravening Trumps own pledge that his organization would pursue no further foreign development deals during his presidency. On top of that, one of Trumps Indonesian business partners, Hary Tanoesoedibjo, recently appeared in a Jakarta-based magazine bragging about his access to Donald Trump, in a piece titled, yes, I Have Access To Donald Trump .

It is, as one might say, a target-rich environment. And yet Chaffetz seems to have hung up his guns.

Whats really puzzling about is that its not clear Chaffetz stands to lose very much by doing his job. In fact, if he wished to spin it this way, he could argue to voters that hes doing the right thing while pursuing narrow partisan interests. If Chaffetz would like to see Trump have an effective presidency and win re-election, then he has a role to play in ensuring this. He should be discussing ethics and conflicts of interest with this White House, warning them about the consequences they could face and laying down the law by insisting that Trump set a proper tone and sign a strong ethics agreement with the OGE.

If Chaffetz were to do this which, again, is what he is paid to do hed be helping Trump have a successful presidency, lessening the likelihood of scandal, and defanging some of the Democratic Partys most potent talking points against the president. To pursue any other path is, frankly, bizarre.

Why would Chaffetz not want Trump to succeed? Why would he risk the wrath of his constituents by looking the other way? At some point, one has to wonder what Chaffetz is getting out of all this. For his sake, I hope its something big and shiny!