Jill Abramson On DOJ Investigations: 'News Gathering Is Being Criminalized' | HuffPost Latest News - Action News
Home WebMail Tuesday, November 5, 2024, 03:46 AM | Calgary | 1.5°C | Regions Advertise Login | Our platform is in maintenance mode. Some URLs may not be available. |
  • No news available at this time.
Posted: 2013-06-02T15:55:54Z | Updated: 2013-06-03T16:03:38Z

Jill Abramson spoke out on Sunday about the New York Times' decision to boycott Eric Holder's meeting with news organizations, saying that the newspaper is worried that "the process of news gathering is being criminalized."

Attorney General Holder recently met with outlets to review the DOJ's guidelines for investigating journalists. The meeting, however, provoked even more controversy when it was announced that it would be off-the-record, prompting the Times among others to abstain from attending .

"To have this private meeting with the attorney general and not be able to share anything about it with our readers didn't seem to have a point to me," Abramson told Bob Schieffer on Sunday's "Face the Nation." "The Times and our readers are quite concerned about the six active criticism leak cases that the Obama administration has pursued. That's more than all the other administrations combined. And, you know, we are concerned that the process of news gathering is being criminalized."

Later, she added that it was important to remember that the public is probably less invested in the case than journalists, and more preoccupied with other issues like the state of the economy and the cost of health care. "Clearly, I'm very concerned about the leak cases... but I'm just not sure they come together and create know -- quote, unquote -- an atmosphere of scandal," Abramson said.

Your Support Has Never Been More Critical

Other news outlets have retreated behind paywalls. At HuffPost, we believe journalism should be free for everyone.

Would you help us provide essential information to our readers during this critical time? We can't do it without you.

You've supported HuffPost before, and we'll be honest we could use your help again . We view our mission to provide free, fair news as critically important in this crucial moment, and we can't do it without you.

Whether you give once or many more times, we appreciate your contribution to keeping our journalism free for all.

You've supported HuffPost before, and we'll be honest we could use your help again . We view our mission to provide free, fair news as critically important in this crucial moment, and we can't do it without you.

Whether you give just one more time or sign up again to contribute regularly, we appreciate you playing a part in keeping our journalism free for all.

Support HuffPost

She also said that it was not just journalists or politicians who are concerned about the DOJ's actions, saying that judges in the leak cases have been critical of the department. "The reporters who work for the Times in Washington have told me many of their sources are petrified even to return calls... it has a real practical effect that is important."