Home WebMail Friday, November 1, 2024, 06:22 AM | Calgary | -3.8°C | Regions Advertise Login | Our platform is in maintenance mode. Some URLs may not be available. |
Posted: 2020-01-27T20:23:53Z | Updated: 2020-01-28T03:32:37Z

WASHINGTON President Donald Trump s impeachment defense team turned over its presentation on Monday to former independent counsel Ken Starr, who, in an ironic turn, argued that Congress tries to impeach presidents too often.

Like war, impeachment is hell, Starr told senators during the second week of Trumps impeachment trial. The lawyer and former federal judge called the constitutional process for removing a president a war of words and of ideas that divides the country like nothing else.

Starr would know. As an independent counsel appointed by the Justice Department, he conducted a yearslong investigation into President Bill Clinton that concluded in 1998 that Clinton should be impeached for lying under oath about his affair with a White House intern. The House impeached Clinton that year; the Senate acquitted him the following February.

The Senate is being called to sit as the high court of impeachment all too frequently, Starr said Monday during his hourlong presentation. Indeed, we are living in what I think can aptly be described as the age of impeachment.

Speaking in a somnambulant tone, Starr said that, after the acrimonious Clinton impeachment, Congress had wisely allowed the expiration of the law that established his independent counsel investigation. But he lamented that the political culture is still overly fond of impeachment.

Trump is only the third U.S. president to be impeached by the House of Representatives (President Richard Nixon resigned from office in 1974 as the House was on the cusp of impeaching him).

Democrats were flabbergasted that Trumps defense team put Starr at the lectern to decry the frequency of impeachment.

I thought it was an absurd argument and quite rich coming from Ken Starr, Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand (D-N.Y.) said.

It was really incredibly surreal to see him talking about impeachment as something that should be done with solemnity and restraint, Sen. Richard Blumenthal (D-Conn.) said.

For a man who spent millions of dollars of taxpayers money to come up with, Oh, my God, the president has to be impeached because of sex during the Clinton time, [thats] probably not a person who should talk, Sen. Patrick Leahy (D-Vt.) said.

One of the articles of impeachment against Trump says he abused his power by trying to coerce a foreign government Ukraine into helping his reelection campaign by investigating a political rival (Joe Biden , who is seeking the Democratic presidential nomination). The other article charges that Trump obstructed Congress in its investigation of his dealings with Ukrainian officials.

Starr argued that the House should allege the president broke specific laws to merit impeachment and removal a theory disputed by legal experts but embraced by Trumps defense team.

Democrats have pointed out that in the past, some of Trumps biggest defenders disputed the position that the Constitution requires statutory violations for a legitimate allegation of high crimes and misdemeanors against a president.

What is a high crime? I think its truth. I think thats what they meant by high crimes. Doesnt have to be a crime. Its just when you start using your office and youre acting in a way that hurts people, you committed a high crime, then-Rep. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) said in 1999 when he served as an impeachment manager in Clintons Senate trial. Graham, elected to the Senate in 2002, now is one of the most vocal critics of Trumps impeachment, arguing it is invalid.

Your Support Has Never Been More Critical

Other news outlets have retreated behind paywalls. At HuffPost, we believe journalism should be free for everyone.

Would you help us provide essential information to our readers during this critical time? We can't do it without you.

You've supported HuffPost before, and we'll be honest we could use your help again . We view our mission to provide free, fair news as critically important in this crucial moment, and we can't do it without you.

Whether you give once or many more times, we appreciate your contribution to keeping our journalism free for all.

You've supported HuffPost before, and we'll be honest we could use your help again . We view our mission to provide free, fair news as critically important in this crucial moment, and we can't do it without you.

Whether you give just one more time or sign up again to contribute regularly, we appreciate you playing a part in keeping our journalism free for all.

Support HuffPost

Alan Dershowitz, another member of Trumps defense team, similarly said in 1998 that a high crime or misdemeanor certainly doesnt have to be a crime to warrant impeachment. The Harvard law professor attempted to wave off his past comments last week, telling CNN his stance against Trumps impeachment is far more correct now .

With Republicans controlling the Senate, the prospect loomed that the chamber would quickly acquit Trump in a trial that featured no witnesses. But in a bombshell development Sunday, The New York Times revealed drafts from former national security adviser John Boltons upcoming book that say Trump tied releasing congressionally approved aid to Ukraine to the countrys announcement that it would investigate Biden and his son Hunter.

The report caught Senate Republicans by surprise and upped the pressure on allowing witnesses to be heard and other evidence to be presented in the trial. Sen. Mitt Romney (R-Utah) said Monday he believes its increasingly likely enough Republicans will now join Democrats to approve a motion to call Bolton to testify.