Nancy Pelosi Tries To Tamp Down Impeachment Fever | HuffPost Latest News - Action News
Home WebMail Tuesday, November 5, 2024, 12:58 AM | Calgary | 1.1°C | Regions Advertise Login | Our platform is in maintenance mode. Some URLs may not be available. |
Posted: 2019-05-22T15:30:18Z | Updated: 2019-05-22T18:07:00Z

WASHINGTON House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) and other Democratic leaders assembled a closed-door, caucus-wide meeting Wednesday to attempt to convince Democrats that they dont need to open an impeachment inquiry, and that their current approach to handling the Trump administration is already working.

It was pretty orchestrated, which is what youd expect, Rep. Steve Cohen (D-Tenn.) said of the presentation meant to pump the brakes on an impeachment inquiry.

She made her argument and its an argument that we can continue, continue, continue, Cohen said of Pelosi.

And the other argument, which I think made a lot of sense, is that time is on their side, Cohen continued, referring to the Trump administration. And its not just a song.

Pelosi didnt say anything against starting impeachment proceedings, according to several members. But with more Democrats and even one Republican calling for starting an impeachment inquiry, and Pelosi championing the status quo approach, the implication was clear: Dont do it.

Speakers argued that Democrats dont need to resort to impeachment proceedings because theyre already winning court cases seeking information. Rep. Bill Pascrell (D-N.J.) told his colleagues that U.S. District Court Judge Amit Mehtas ruling on Monday, which slapped down a Trump effort to block a subpoena , showed that courts will be favorable to Democratic oversight efforts.

We dont need impeachment procedures to get the information that we need, Pascrell said he told his fellow Democrats.

Mehta upheld a House Oversight Committee subpoena that asked a private accounting firm for some of President Donald Trumps personal financial records thereby rejecting the Trump administrations argument that the subpoena served no legitimate legislative purpose. The administration has made the same argument in other cases, though most of those involve efforts to obtain testimony or information from government officials, rather than a private organization.

The expectation is there will be more to follow, Rep. Gerry Connolly (D-Va.) said of the ruling, which he called comprehensive and sweeping.

Connolly added that the message of the meeting Wednesday was to be a little patient, because things are breaking our way.

One problem with that approach is that previous administrations have been able to stretch court proceedings beyond the political lifespan of the underlying requests. And the Trump administration has indicated it will appeal the Mehta ruling to a higher court.

The special meeting Wednesday comes after a flood of new calls from Democratic members to open an impeachment inquiry. Trump administration officials continue to ignore subpoenas demanding testimony and certain documents related to oversight investigations, and Democrats have been left with little recourse. There are a number of lawsuits working their way through the courts, and Democrats have flirted with ideas like inherent contempt , which would allow Congress to fine or even jail uncooperative administration officials. But resolving those cases could take months or even years.

Pelosi said after the meeting that she believed Trump was engaged in a cover-up.

We do believe its important to follow the facts. We believe that no one is above the law, including the president of the United States, the California Democrat added.

Pelosi then went to a meeting at the White House on infrastructure that quickly blew up when Trump insisted he wouldnt work on the issue until Democrats ended all of their investigations. The president then called a Rose Garden press conference where he slammed Democrats, and Pelosi and Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) called their own to slam the president.

Pelosi then went to a Center for American Progress event where she reiterated that it was in plain sight that Trump is obstructing justice and hes engaged in a cover-up.

And that could be an impeachable offense, she said.

But the tough talk appears to be more misdirection from Pelosi, who has said in the past that Trumps behavior is self-impeaching and that impeachments too good for him. Those words are functionally meaningless when the speaker then works to prevent impeachment from moving forward.

Many Democrats are hesitant to move forward with impeachment, and the ones who do want to open an inquiry are being thwarted by Pelosi and her allies at every turn.

That didnt stop House Financial Services Committee chair Maxine Waters (D-Calif.) from arguing for impeachment Wednesday, nor did it stop leadership member Rep. David Cicilline (D-R.I.) from speaking twice about the need to hold the president accountable and to elevate the seriousness of their investigations through opening an inquiry. And it didnt stop Rep. Jared Huffman (D-Calif.) from saying that betting everything on the 2020 election would be a historic mistake.

Pelosis response to those arguing for impeachment was to implore them not to raise money off their stance.

Still, House Ways and Means Committee chair Richard Neal (D-Mass.), who is leading the effort to obtain the presidents tax returns, described the meeting as a calm family conversation.

I dont think the speaker said anything other than we should continue the work of the individual committees based upon their responsibilities, Neal said.

Democratic leadership also believes opening impeachment proceedings would stymie all other legislative goals for this Congress.

Your Support Has Never Been More Critical

Other news outlets have retreated behind paywalls. At HuffPost, we believe journalism should be free for everyone.

Would you help us provide essential information to our readers during this critical time? We can't do it without you.

You've supported HuffPost before, and we'll be honest we could use your help again . We view our mission to provide free, fair news as critically important in this crucial moment, and we can't do it without you.

Whether you give once or many more times, we appreciate your contribution to keeping our journalism free for all.

You've supported HuffPost before, and we'll be honest we could use your help again . We view our mission to provide free, fair news as critically important in this crucial moment, and we can't do it without you.

Whether you give just one more time or sign up again to contribute regularly, we appreciate you playing a part in keeping our journalism free for all.

Support HuffPost

In a statement Tuesday night, ahead of their meeting at the White House on Wednesday, Pelosi and Schumer said they looked forward to Trump presenting ideas for pay-fors to offset the cost of a $2 trillion infrastructure plan. Its difficult to work with a president on legislation when impeachment proceedings are working their way through Congress, though with Trump now insisting that all investigations end before he works on things like an infrastructure package, Democrats also have reason to doubt whether they can accomplish anything with a Republican Senate and Trump as president.

But Democratic leaders continue to see it differently.

We were elected to get things done on behalf of the American people with a focus on driving down the high-cost of life-saving prescription drugs, and act on a real infrastructure plan, Democratic Caucus Chairman Hakeem Jeffries (D-N.Y.) told reporters Wednesday. Were proceeding in that regard.

This story has been updated throughout.