Home WebMail Friday, November 1, 2024, 12:20 PM | Calgary | -4.1°C | Regions Advertise Login | Our platform is in maintenance mode. Some URLs may not be available. |
Posted: 2022-01-26T22:47:40Z | Updated: 2022-01-26T22:47:40Z

Sen. Ron Johnson (R-Wis.) offered an ice-cold argument Tuesday against subsidizing child care for working parents: Taking care of all these children just isnt societys job.

People decide to have families and become parents; thats something they need to consider when they make that choice, Johnson told TV station WKBT during a visit to Kwik Trips headquarters in La Crosse, Wisconsin.

Ive never really felt it was societys responsibility to take care of other peoples children, Johnson said.

Technically, other peoples children are part of society. Everyone knows the proverb that it takes a village to raise a child.

But Johnsons point is that parents should take care of their own children, and he said society does have a responsibility to provide job opportunities for parents.

Unfortunately, becoming a parent can make it more difficult to hold a job, since child care is often unaffordable, unavailable or only available at times that dont fit an employers schedule. Nationally, there isnt enough child care for the preschool population. One result of these challenges is that children in the U.S. have higher poverty rates than other age groups and higher rates than children in other advanced countries.

Democrats had hoped to create a massive child care subsidy program as part of the Build Back Better Act, vowing that, if it passed, no working parents would have to pay more than 7% of their income on child care. The bill is currently stalled.

Other Republicans have offered much more sophisticated complaints about the proposal than Johnsons. Several argued that the bills higher standards for providers would unfairly increase costs for parents whose incomes make them ineligible for subsidies.

Johnsons comment may have been ham-handed, but his free market view isnt really an outlier among his peers in Congress, and his statement illustrates a stark difference between the parties on family economics.

Democrats have made slashing child poverty a core of their agenda. Last year they transformed the child tax credit to a monthly cash program paying most American parents as much as $300 per child from July through December, resulting in a sharp decline in child poverty.

Your Support Has Never Been More Critical

Other news outlets have retreated behind paywalls. At HuffPost, we believe journalism should be free for everyone.

Would you help us provide essential information to our readers during this critical time? We can't do it without you.

You've supported HuffPost before, and we'll be honest we could use your help again . We view our mission to provide free, fair news as critically important in this crucial moment, and we can't do it without you.

Whether you give once or many more times, we appreciate your contribution to keeping our journalism free for all.

You've supported HuffPost before, and we'll be honest we could use your help again . We view our mission to provide free, fair news as critically important in this crucial moment, and we can't do it without you.

Whether you give just one more time or sign up again to contribute regularly, we appreciate you playing a part in keeping our journalism free for all.

Support HuffPost

Republicans have ignored the poverty reduction and said the program simply exacerbates labor shortages by making parents less willing to work, calling it another part of Democrats socialist program that diminishes peoples freedom including the freedom to be involuntarily poor.

As Johnson put it in a tweet on Wednesday , The Left wants the government to run the family. I believe the parents do.