Home WebMail Friday, November 1, 2024, 06:28 AM | Calgary | -3.8°C | Regions Advertise Login | Our platform is in maintenance mode. Some URLs may not be available. |
Posted: 2021-02-04T21:18:10Z | Updated: 2021-02-04T23:03:49Z

Electronic voting system company Smartmatic has filed a $2.7 billion defamation lawsuit against Fox News owner, Fox News Corporation, accusing the company of repeatedly and falsely reporting that Smartmatic rigged the 2020 election.

In addition to Fox News Corporation, the suit, which was filed Thursday in New York State Court in Manhattan, specifically names Fox personalities Maria Bartiromo, Lou Dobbs and Jeanine Pirro. Donald Trump s personal lawyer Rudy Giuliani and attorney Sidney Powell, to whom Fox News granted extensive airtime, are also defendants.

Smartmatic alleges that Fox News saw an opportunity to capitalize on President Trumps popularity after his 2020 election loss, and that it did not report on the demonstrable and irrefutable truth that Joe Biden and Kamala Harris victory was not stolen, rigged, or fixed. Instead, the suit says, the network and its on-air personalities made a villain out of Smartmatic then smeared it in a monthslong disinformation campaign.

Defendants story was a lie, the suit reads. All of it. And they knew it. But, it was a story that sold.

Fox News knowingly broadcast the falsehood that Smartmatic somehow stole the election 13 times in November and December 2020, the complaint alleges. The claim was also repeated in articles and on social media.

Conspiracy theorists have made many claims against Smartmatic without evidence, including that the company somehow skewed votes in favor of Biden while working in cahoots with the voting system manufacturer Dominion Voting Systems.

Both companies have flatly denied that claim and many, many others . (Dominion filed a $1.3 billion defamation lawsuit against Giuliani last week.)

Smartmatics actual involvement in the 2020 election was quite small; it only to provided technology and support to Los Angeles County.

In addition to generating cash for Fox News and potentially benefiting individuals, as Trump granted Pirros ex-husband a presidential pardon the story of election fraud helped the network preserve its grip on viewers and readers at the expense of the country, according to the lawsuit:

The story, of course, did more than just make Defendants money and jeopardize Smartmatics survival. The story undermined peoples belief in democracy. The story turned neighbor against neighbor. The story led a mob to attack the U.S. Capitol. Defendants started a fire for selfish and financial reasons and they cared not the damage their story caused to Smartmatic, its officers and employees, and the country.

In an emailed statement, a Fox News Media spokesperson called the lawsuit meritless and said the company is proud of its 2020 election coverage. (However, Fox News fired Chris Stirewalt , a politics editor involved with the networks decision to call Arizona for Biden, last month.)

Smartmatic previously sent retraction demands to Fox News, Newsmax and One America News Network on Dec. 15, warning that noncompliance could lead to defamation suits.

Soon after, Fox News ran a fact-checking segment. None of the personalities named in the lawsuit participated in the roughly two-minute clip, which featured a pretaped interview with Edward Perez of the nonprofit Open Source Election Technology Institute contradicting the election security claims.

Fox News viewership has nosedived of late. In January, its viewership ranked third behind rivals CNN and MSNBC a low it hasnt seen since 2001.

Your Support Has Never Been More Critical

Other news outlets have retreated behind paywalls. At HuffPost, we believe journalism should be free for everyone.

Would you help us provide essential information to our readers during this critical time? We can't do it without you.

You've supported HuffPost before, and we'll be honest we could use your help again . We view our mission to provide free, fair news as critically important in this crucial moment, and we can't do it without you.

Whether you give once or many more times, we appreciate your contribution to keeping our journalism free for all.

You've supported HuffPost before, and we'll be honest we could use your help again . We view our mission to provide free, fair news as critically important in this crucial moment, and we can't do it without you.

Whether you give just one more time or sign up again to contribute regularly, we appreciate you playing a part in keeping our journalism free for all.

Support HuffPost

CORRECTION: This article previously misstated that Trump pardoned Pirros husband; rather, he pardoned her ex-husband. Language has also been amended to reflect that Chris Stirewalt was not solely responsible for Fox News decision to forecast Arizonas election results for Joe Biden.