Home WebMail Friday, November 1, 2024, 11:20 PM | Calgary | -2.1°C | Regions Advertise Login | Our platform is in maintenance mode. Some URLs may not be available. |
Posted: 2022-03-11T21:16:14Z | Updated: 2022-03-11T21:16:14Z

The Texas Supreme Court dealt a blow to abortion providers Friday by ruling that state officials are not responsible for enforcing the states six-week abortion ban and therefore cannot be subjected to such lawsuits.

The 23-page, unanimous decision is a devastating setback for Texans, Alexis McGill Johnson, president and CEO of Planned Parenthood Federation of America said following the decision.

Over and over again the courts have failed Texans, who have been stripped of their fundamental right to abortion for more than six months now, she said in a statement.

Texas six-week abortion ban , which went into effect in September, was crafted with a legal loophole thats allowed it to evade every legal challenge thus far. Instead of requiring the state to enforce the ban, the law deputizes citizens to do so and offers a $10,000 financial incentive if an individual successfully sues a person for aiding and abetting someone seeking an abortion.

Since it went into effect, abortions in Texas have plummeted by more than 50%. Many patients have undergone the expensive endeavor of traveling out of state for the procedure, contributing to an overwhelming demand for reproductive care in Oklahoma and other nearby states.

The decision by the Texas court, which is entirely made up of Republicans , means that abortion providers cannot sue state officials in order to challenge the ban. Officials named in the lawsuit included Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton, the states health and human services commissioner and the heads of the states medical, nursing and pharmacy boards.

The situation is becoming increasingly dire, and now neighboring stateswhere we have been sending patientsare about to pass similar bans. Where will Texans go then? said Amy Hagstrom Miller, president and CEO of Whole Womans Health, which was named as the plaintiff in the lawsuit against state officials.

Your Support Has Never Been More Critical

Other news outlets have retreated behind paywalls. At HuffPost, we believe journalism should be free for everyone.

Would you help us provide essential information to our readers during this critical time? We can't do it without you.

You've supported HuffPost before, and we'll be honest we could use your help again . We view our mission to provide free, fair news as critically important in this crucial moment, and we can't do it without you.

Whether you give once or many more times, we appreciate your contribution to keeping our journalism free for all.

You've supported HuffPost before, and we'll be honest we could use your help again . We view our mission to provide free, fair news as critically important in this crucial moment, and we can't do it without you.

Whether you give just one more time or sign up again to contribute regularly, we appreciate you playing a part in keeping our journalism free for all.

Support HuffPost

The Texas law has bounced around the courts since it went into effect last year. In December, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that abortion providers could contest the ban in federal court and name state licensing officials as defendants. Plaintiffs asked that the case be sent to a federal district court that previously blocked the law, but the justices instead sent it to the extremely conservative U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit, which finally punted it to the Texas Supreme Court for Fridays decision.

Other lawsuits seeking to stop private citizens from enforcing the ban may still proceed.