Home WebMail Friday, November 1, 2024, 10:24 AM | Calgary | -5.1°C | Regions Advertise Login | Our platform is in maintenance mode. Some URLs may not be available. |
Posted: 2023-08-08T23:37:17Z | Updated: 2023-08-08T23:37:17Z

The federal judge overseeing the new case against Donald Trump scheduled a hearing Friday to consider prosecutors request for a protective order limiting what the former president can say about the case.

Judge Tanya Chutkans decision to schedule the hearing comes a day after Trumps legal team asked her to reject the protective order request, arguing that it restricts his First Amendment rights. Trump whos facing trial for election interference related to the Jan. 6, 2021, riot at the U.S. Capitol is not required to appear at the 10 a.m. hearing.

Shortly before Chutkan scheduled Fridays hearing, Trump went after her on his social media site Truth Social , pointing out that she was nominated by former President Barack Obama and accusing her of having a conflict of interest in the case. Chutkan is known for being one of the toughest sentencers of the Jan. 6 rioters.

Federal prosecutors in the case made the protective order request with Chutkan last Friday, seeking to block Trump or his legal team from disclosing the governments court materials to anyone other than people involved in the legal proceedings ahead of the trial, including grand jury witness testimony and materials obtained via sealed search warrants.

While such protective orders are not uncommon, prosecutors said its especially important that Trump be put under one because of his propensity for posting inflammatory statements on his social media accounts. Not issuing the protective order, they argued, could have a harmful chilling effect on witnesses or adversely affect the fair administration of justice in this case.

Trumps attorneys responded later Friday asking to limit any protective order to generally sensitive material and said the broader one sought by prosecutors would infringe on Trumps ability to campaign for the GOPs presidential nomination.

In a trial about First Amendment rights, the government seeks to restrict First Amendment rights, they wrote. Worse, it does so against its administrations primary political opponent, during an election season in which the administration, prominent party members, and media allies have campaigned on the indictment and proliferated its false allegations.

Your Support Has Never Been More Critical

Other news outlets have retreated behind paywalls. At HuffPost, we believe journalism should be free for everyone.

Would you help us provide essential information to our readers during this critical time? We can't do it without you.

You've supported HuffPost before, and we'll be honest we could use your help again . We view our mission to provide free, fair news as critically important in this crucial moment, and we can't do it without you.

Whether you give once or many more times, we appreciate your contribution to keeping our journalism free for all.

You've supported HuffPost before, and we'll be honest we could use your help again . We view our mission to provide free, fair news as critically important in this crucial moment, and we can't do it without you.

Whether you give just one more time or sign up again to contribute regularly, we appreciate you playing a part in keeping our journalism free for all.

Support HuffPost

The courts placed Trump under similar protective orders in his two other cases, which concern hush money payments made to the adult film star Stormy Daniels and his handling of classified documents.