Home WebMail Friday, November 1, 2024, 05:22 AM | Calgary | -3.0°C | Regions Advertise Login | Our platform is in maintenance mode. Some URLs may not be available. |
Posted: 2024-03-05T04:58:51Z | Updated: 2024-03-05T04:58:51Z

DENVER (AP) Former President Donald Trump gained a clear win at the U.S. Supreme Court on Monday, which unanimously ruled that states dont have the ability to bar him or any other federal candidates from the ballot under a rarely-used constitutional provision that prohibits those who engaged in insurrection from holding office.

The decision shuts down a push in dozens of states to end Trumps candidacy through a clause in the 14th Amendment, written to prevent former Confederates from serving in government after the Civil War.

But it may open the door to further electoral uncertainty, exposing more state officials to disqualification under the provision and setting up a constitutional showdown should Trump win the election.

Facing four separate criminal trials, Trumps legal peril may just be beginning. So is the Supreme Courts role in that process.

Here are some takeaways:

A TECHNICAL, BUT STILL BIG, WIN

The most significant thing the court did Monday was to overturn a Colorado Supreme Court ruling from December that Trump was not eligible to be president because he violated the insurrection clause, Section 3, of the 14th Amendment.

This will also stop efforts to kick him off the ballot in Illinois, Maine and other states. Had the Supreme Court let the Colorado ruling stand, it could have triggered a new wave of litigation that might have left Trump disqualified in many states.

The high court avoided addressing that politically contentious issue of whether Trump played a role in the Jan. 6 attack on the U.S. Capitol that would have barred him from seeking office. The ruling is almost devoid of references to Jan. 6 or insurrection, and doesnt address whether Trump committed such an act by sparking the attack on the Capitol.