Home WebMail Friday, November 1, 2024, 03:40 AM | Calgary | -3.6°C | Regions Advertise Login | Our platform is in maintenance mode. Some URLs may not be available. |
Posted: 2017-02-06T19:06:28Z | Updated: 2017-02-07T00:47:11Z

A group of former high-level government officials, nearly 100 tech CEOs and several state governments have all mounted legal opposition to President Donald Trump s immigration order, stating that it jeopardizes national security and stifles the U.S. economy.

The latest is a declaration filed Monday in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit by former secretaries of state Madeline Albright and John Kerry and several other former national security officials. In the filing, they expressed support for the temporary restraining order a Seattle judge issued last week against Trumps executive order barring all Syrian refugees and people from seven majority-Muslim countries from entering the U.S.

Trumps order, they wrote, endangers U.S. troops and intelligence officials in those regions, disrupts counterterrorism and diplomatic efforts, alienates Muslim Americans who could aid in identifying radicals, has a devastating humanitarian impact, hurts the U.S. economy and could feed the recruitment narrative of ISIL and other extremists that portray the United States as at war with Islam.

The letter was co-signed by former government officials including former Defense Secretary Leon Panetta, former Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano, former CIA director Michael Hayden, and former National Security Adviser Susan Rice.

Immigrants are among our leading entrepreneurs, politicians, artists and philanthropists.

Their declaration follows an amicus friend of the court brief that nearly 100 influential companies, including Apple, Facebook , Google , Netflix , Twitter and Microsoft, filed late Sunday to the 9th Circuit.

Immigrants are among our leading entrepreneurs, politicians, artists and philanthropists, the brief stated. The experience and energy of people who come to our country to seek a better life for themselves and their children to pursue the American Dream are woven throughout the social political and economic fabric of the Nation.

The executive order, they continued, makes it more difficult and expensive for U.S. companies to recruit, hire, and retain some of the worlds best employees, so American workers and the economy will suffer as a result.

Both filings were in support of a lawsuit filed by Washington state and joined by Minnesota last Friday, which won a temporary nationwide restraining order against Trumps executive order.

Also joining the action late Sunday was the state of Hawaii, which filed a motion to join the other two states in the appeal over the travel ban. The state had filed its own lawsuit in federal court hours before Trumps order was blocked nationwide, and is now seeking intervention to protect its own unique interests.

By virtue of the States especially heavy reliance on tourism, the Executive Orders travel restrictions could immediately inflict damage on its economy, the state said in its brief. In addition, because Hawaii is an island state, residents are entirely reliant on air travel to leave and return home, and, for the vast majority, to travel between islands.

Others who have weighed in against the travel ban before the 9th Circuit include a New York-led coalition of 15 states and the District of Columbia , the American Civil Liberties Union , constitutional scholars , and the Korematsu Center , a nonprofit that urges courts to understand the historical and discriminatory roots of government action aimed at racial minorities.

The 9th Circuit on Sunday shot down the Department of Justices request to immediately reinstate the ban, but the court will soon determine whether to keep it frozen while the states challenge proceeds in lower court.

In a separate case on the East Coast, the Commonwealth of Virginia asked a federal judge to force Trump , U.S. Customs and Border Protection and top government officials to show why they shouldnt be held in contempt for failing to obey a lawful court order allowing attorneys access to legal permanent residents who had been detained at Dulles International Airport as a result of the executive order . That request and related legal challenges remain ongoing.

Your Support Has Never Been More Critical

Other news outlets have retreated behind paywalls. At HuffPost, we believe journalism should be free for everyone.

Would you help us provide essential information to our readers during this critical time? We can't do it without you.

You've supported HuffPost before, and we'll be honest we could use your help again . We view our mission to provide free, fair news as critically important in this crucial moment, and we can't do it without you.

Whether you give once or many more times, we appreciate your contribution to keeping our journalism free for all.

You've supported HuffPost before, and we'll be honest we could use your help again . We view our mission to provide free, fair news as critically important in this crucial moment, and we can't do it without you.

Whether you give just one more time or sign up again to contribute regularly, we appreciate you playing a part in keeping our journalism free for all.

Support HuffPost

Earlier that week, Californias state Senate passed a resolution condemning the immigration executive order, saying it desecrates our American values and panders to fears and nativist instincts.

In addition to the legal proceedings against Trumps travel order, several business leaders have spoken out against it including those from Starbucks, Goldman Sachs, Ford , Netflix, Airbnb, Lyft and Nike along with many celebrities and athletes .

Cristian Farias contributed reporting.