Home WebMail Friday, November 1, 2024, 12:18 PM | Calgary | -4.1°C | Regions Advertise Login | Our platform is in maintenance mode. Some URLs may not be available. |
Posted: 2019-03-25T00:24:27Z | Updated: 2019-03-25T14:34:17Z

WASHINGTON Attorney General William Barr told Congress on Sunday that he and Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein had concluded that the evidence Robert Mueller developed during his special counsel investigation is not sufficient to establish that President Donald Trump committed obstruction of justice.

What Barrs letter doesnt mention is that less than a year ago, hed criticized Muellers focus on obstruction of justice in an unsolicited 19-page memo to Justice Department officials.

Barrs letter on Sunday said that Muellers report featured a cataloguing of the presidents actions, many of which took place in public view. Muellers report did not draw a conclusion one way or the other as to whether Trump obstructed justice, Barr wrote. Muellers report states that while it does not conclude that the President committed a crime, it also does not exonerate him, Barr noted.

Generally speaking, to obtain and sustain an obstruction conviction, the government would need to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that a person, acting with corrupt intent, engaged in obstructive conduct with a sufficient nexus to a pending or contemplated proceeding, the attorney general wrote. He said that those elements werent present in the Trump actions scrutinized in Muellers report.

But as Barrs June 2018 memo to his now-subordinates Rosenstein and Steve Engel, the assistant attorney general for the Office of Legal Counsel, makes clear, the attorney general has a very narrow view of what counts as obstruction.

Muellers core premise that the President acts corruptly if he attempts to influence a proceeding in which his own conduct is being scrutinized is untenable, Barr wrote in the 2018 memo. Barr said that the president would not be transgressing any legal limitation if he exercised his supervisory authority over cases dealing with his own interests. It may be in some cases politically unwise; but it is not a crime, Barr argued.

Your Support Has Never Been More Critical

Other news outlets have retreated behind paywalls. At HuffPost, we believe journalism should be free for everyone.

Would you help us provide essential information to our readers during this critical time? We can't do it without you.

You've supported HuffPost before, and we'll be honest we could use your help again . We view our mission to provide free, fair news as critically important in this crucial moment, and we can't do it without you.

Whether you give once or many more times, we appreciate your contribution to keeping our journalism free for all.

You've supported HuffPost before, and we'll be honest we could use your help again . We view our mission to provide free, fair news as critically important in this crucial moment, and we can't do it without you.

Whether you give just one more time or sign up again to contribute regularly, we appreciate you playing a part in keeping our journalism free for all.

Support HuffPost

The practical implications of Muellers approach, especially in light of its shapeless concept of obstruction, are astounding, Barr wrote.

Read Barrs June 2018 letter below: