The Trump administration last week tapped William Perry Pendley, a conservative lawyer who has spent decades campaigning against federal land protection, to oversee 245 million acres of public land more than 10% of the entire U.S. landmass.

Its an appointment that many, including current and former Bureau of Land Management officials, view as part of a broader effort aimed at pawning off Americas natural heritage.

This is Sagebrush Rebellion 2020, one current BLM employee in the West told HuffPost, adding that it is hard to imagine Pendleys appointment isnt a move toward eventually selling off federal lands or transferring control to the states.

All the news about the BLM is really depressing and fits with this administration that is trying to destroy everything in the name of profits as we face serious economic and environmental catastrophe, the BLM employee, who requested anonymity for fear of retribution, told HuffPost in a text message. I try not to think about it too much.

Pendley is the former longtime president of Mountain States Legal Foundation, a conservative nonprofit that advocates for selling off millions of federal acres in the West. He first served as an Interior Department appointee during President Ronald Reagans administration. Pendley was appointed in mid-July to a senior policy position at the federal Bureau of Land Management. Then last week, Interior Secretary David Bernhardt, a former oil and gas lobbyist, quietly signed an order elevating him to the role of acting director, putting a man who detests federal land policy at the helm of a bureau that manages more than one-third of all federal land and 700 million subsurface mineral acres all without Pendley having to go through a Senate confirmation process.

The Wyoming native has extreme anti-government views. He despises the Endangered Species Act, once writing the bedrock conservation law seeks to kill or prevent anybody from making a living on federal land . He has sued the federal government numerous times in the last three decades, including over ESA listings and national monument designations. Hes called the science of climate change junk science and blasted the Obama administration for waging a perceived war on coal.

But its Pendleys view of the federal estate that has conservationists most alarmed. He believes public lands shouldnt exist at all.

Founding Fathers intended all lands owned by the federal government to be sold, he wrote in a January 2016 op-ed published by The National Review. Pendley wrote several books about land issues in the West, including one titled Sagebrush Rebel, a reference to the Sagebrush Rebellion movement of the 1970s and 80s that sought to free lands from federal control. Until recently, he was posting under the Twitter handle @Sagebrush_Rebel.

Bringing Pendley aboard might seem like a puzzling move for an administration that has repeatedly vowed not to dispose of federal acres. But for those paying close attention, theres been a rising interest in offloading national treasures since President Donald Trump took office.

On March 4, 2017, the morning after being sworn in as the 52nd secretary of the Interior Department, Ryan Zinke addressed agency employees at the departments headquarters in Washington. Exactly one minute into the speech, he delivered a clear promise: You can hear it from my lips: We will not sell or transfer public land. It wont happen.

The comment drew a lengthy round of applause. Zinke had bucked his own party on the issue, resigning as a delegate to the Republican National Convention in 2016 over its support for transferring federal lands. Its a big reason that many hunting, fishing and conservation groups initially backed him for the position .

As the months ticked by, however, the Trump administration began flirting with the pro-land-transfer movement. Zinke and other Cabinet officials sidled up to groups at the front of the effort to get public lands out of the federal governments hands. Zinke tapped several opponents of federal land policy for high-ranking department positions, including Wyoming attorney Karen Budd-Falen and Ryan Nichols, formerly of the conservative Heritage Foundation.

And Trumps initial $200 billion infrastructure plan, unveiled by the White House in February 2018, called explicitly for selling off federal assets that would be better managed by state, local, or private entities. The George Washington Parkway and Ronald Reagan Washington National Airport were among the federal properties identified for possible sale.

The Bureau of Land Management proposed selling off public lands at least three times under Zinkes watch, most notably 1,600 acres that Trump carved out of Grand Staircase-Escalante monument. That particular proposal, buried in a draft resource management plan released last August and first reported by HuffPost, called for selling or transferring 16 federal parcels that had been protected as part of the Utah monument until Trumps sweeping rollback in December 2017. Interior quickly scrapped the plan amid public backlash, saying it was inconsistent with agency policy.

In November 2018, Interior hosted at its D.C. headquarters members of the right-wing American Legislative Exchange Council, the Koch brothers-backed nonprofit pushing for the federal government to hand over control of its lands to states. At the closed-door event, Zinke apparently stood his ground on sale and transfer, but voiced support for entering into agreements with states to give them a greater say in how public lands are managed, according to posts by South Carolina state Rep. Alan Clemmons (R), the secretary of ALECs board of directors.

So much progress is coming from the work and leadership of Secretary Zinke, Utah state Rep. Ken Ivory (R), the former head of the Free the Lands project, wrote in a Facebook post, along with photos of him posing with Zinke and other agency officials.

Despite leading the largest reduction of protected national monuments in American history and opening millions of acres of public land to drilling and mining, Zinke continued to portray himself and his boss as the ultimate defenders of public lands. He resigned in January amid numerous ethics scandals, leaving some to wonder if the former Montana congressman was all that stood between the administration and large-scale land transfers.

The Interior Department did not respond to HuffPosts multiple requests for comment. But in a statement to The Washington Post, an agency spokesman said that the administration adamantly opposes the wholesale sale or transfer of public lands.

Along with Pendleys swift rise to the top of the federal land bureau, the Interior Department last month announced plans to relocate the majority of BLM staff at the agencys Washington headquarters to Western states. The administration has said the decision to shuffle employees at BLM and other agencies around is about putting federal officials closer to the people they serve and resources they manage a talking point that was clearly lost on acting White House chief of staff Mick Mulvaney, who over the weekend boasted that relocations are a wonderful way to get rid of civil servants.

In the case of BLM, two former agency directors Robert V. Abbey and Patrick Shea told Bloomberg they expect theres a second, more insidious goal: to paralyze the agency in a way that could ultimately justify land transfers.

Kate Kelly, public lands director at the left-leaning Center for American Progress and a former Interior Department official in the Obama administration, agrees.

They are attempting to Balkanize the agency and scatter and isolate its leadership across the West, she told HuffPost. The long-term impact of that will be to weaken the agency such that its hard to have cohesive positions and even provide the services that are expected of the federal government to manage public lands. If the agency is weakened enough, it could give credence to the more extreme view that the federal government shouldnt be managing these public lands.

One place this effort could materialize is within BLM draft resource management plans, which often receive little public attention but shape how large swaths of federal land are used for years to come.

If they strip away a conservation identity and suggest that these lands would be better managed by states or industry, that is hard to pull back, Kelly said.

In its draft plan last year for former Grand Staircase-Escalante lands, BLM did not specify why it initially identified the 16 parcels for possible sale. But emails released as part of a request for public records detailed the agencys decision to include a 120-acre piece of land adjacent to property owned by then-Utah state Rep. Mike Noel (R), a fierce Trump ally and opponent of the Clinton-era monument. That particular parcel was selected because it is isolated and best fit the criteria for a more development-oriented approach, a BLM official wrote in an internal email .

A recent Pew Charitable Trusts analysis of six Trump administration draft land-use plans covering more than 20 million acres in five states found the agency is moving to strip away longstanding protections and open new areas for energy and mineral development.