The mass shooting in Virginia Beach last week has reinvigorated the debate over the regulation of gun suppressors also known as silencers which muffle the sounds of gunfire.
The shooter behind the attack, which left 12 people dead on Friday, used a suppressor on his firearm. One survivor described the sounds of his weapon as something like a nail gun.
Gun-control advocates have argued that suppressors add to the threat of gun violence and have heavily criticized the National Rifle Association for its push to roll back regulations on them.
Silencers put law enforcement and civilians at risk. Rep. Val Demings (D-Fla.), who formerly served as Orlandos chief of police, said Monday on Twitter. The NRAs embrace of them is a cynical cash-grab.
When people hear the sound of a gunshot, they know to run, hide or call the police, Shannon Watts, founder of Moms Demand Action for Gun Sense in America, said on Twitter. Hearing and identifying a gunshot can mean the difference between life and death.
On Sunday, when asked if silencers should be restricted, President Donald Trump said, I dont like them at all.
Pro-gun advocates are quick to point out that suppressors which reduce noise by 20 to 35 decibels do not fully silence the sounds of gunfire, denying that they pose a threat to potential shooting victims. They insist that suppressors provide important ear protections to gun owners.
A reminder that silencer is a misnomer and they dont silence the sound of firing by any means, Dana Loesch, a spokeswoman for the NRA, said on Twitter in response to Trumps comments.
Loeschs comments echo a continued effort by pro-gun advocates to rebrand silencers as suppressors in part an attempt to shift the image away from the weapons used by hitmen in Hollywood films. But with the recent attack fresh in the publics mind, the idea of gun suppressors as merely ear protection may be a harder sell.
Demings and other gun-control advocates and lawmakers have argued that any reduction in noise can cause confusion over where the gunfire originates a confusion that can be fatal.
Theres clear evidence from the survivors in Virginia Beach that the shooters silencer made the attack harder to identify and avoid, potentially costing lives, Demings told HuffPost. Silencers make it harder for first responders and civilians to identify gunshots and respond quickly, and make it harder to track the location of shooters.
At the federal level, suppressors are regulated under the National Firearms Act, and the process of obtaining one includes, among other things, an extensive background check that can take six to nine months. In eight states California, Delaware, Hawaii, Illinois, Massachusetts, New Jersey, New York and Rhode Island and the District of Columbia, suppressors are outlawed entirely. A package of gun-control legislation, including a ban on suppressors, announced by Virginia Gov. Ralph Northam (D) could make his state the ninth.
Earlier this year, Rep. Jeff Duncan (R-S.C.) reintroduced the Hearing Protection Act, a bill that would roll back federal regulations on gun suppressors. Rep. Steve King (R-Iowa) and Sen. Mike Lee (R-Utah) reintroduced a similar bill, titled the Silencers Help Us Save Hearing Act. Both bills were referred to subcommittees following their introduction and no action has been taken on them since.
A spokesman for Lee declined to comment on whether his stance had changed in light of the shooting. Spokespeople for King and Duncan did not respond to a request for comment.
Theres no question here that there is a movement to make it easier to get suppressors, Juliette Kayyem, a former assistant secretary of homeland security, said in an interview with PBS . Virginia Beach should be a sort of wakeup call, that that not only harms people who might be victims, but harms the ability for police to get in quickly and know where the sound is coming from.
Our 2024 Coverage Needs You
It's Another Trump-Biden Showdown And We Need Your Help
The Future Of Democracy Is At Stake
Our 2024 Coverage Needs You
Your Loyalty Means The World To Us
As Americans head to the polls in 2024, the very future of our country is at stake. At HuffPost, we believe that a free press is critical to creating well-informed voters. That's why our journalism is free for everyone, even though other newsrooms retreat behind expensive paywalls.
Our journalists will continue to cover the twists and turns during this historic presidential election. With your help, we'll bring you hard-hitting investigations, well-researched analysis and timely takes you can't find elsewhere. Reporting in this current political climate is a responsibility we do not take lightly, and we thank you for your support.
Contribute as little as $2 to keep our news free for all.
Can't afford to donate? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.
The 2024 election is heating up, and women's rights, health care, voting rights, and the very future of democracy are all at stake. Donald Trump will face Joe Biden in the most consequential vote of our time. And HuffPost will be there, covering every twist and turn. America's future hangs in the balance. Would you consider contributing to support our journalism and keep it free for all during this critical season?
HuffPost believes news should be accessible to everyone, regardless of their ability to pay for it. We rely on readers like you to help fund our work. Any contribution you can make even as little as $2 goes directly toward supporting the impactful journalism that we will continue to produce this year. Thank you for being part of our story.
Can't afford to donate? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.
It's official: Donald Trump will face Joe Biden this fall in the presidential election. As we face the most consequential presidential election of our time, HuffPost is committed to bringing you up-to-date, accurate news about the 2024 race. While other outlets have retreated behind paywalls, you can trust our news will stay free.
But we can't do it without your help. Reader funding is one of the key ways we support our newsroom. Would you consider making a donation to help fund our news during this critical time? Your contributions are vital to supporting a free press.
Contribute as little as $2 to keep our journalism free and accessible to all.
Can't afford to donate? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.
As Americans head to the polls in 2024, the very future of our country is at stake. At HuffPost, we believe that a free press is critical to creating well-informed voters. That's why our journalism is free for everyone, even though other newsrooms retreat behind expensive paywalls.
Our journalists will continue to cover the twists and turns during this historic presidential election. With your help, we'll bring you hard-hitting investigations, well-researched analysis and timely takes you can't find elsewhere. Reporting in this current political climate is a responsibility we do not take lightly, and we thank you for your support.
Contribute as little as $2 to keep our news free for all.
Can't afford to donate? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.
Dear HuffPost Reader
Thank you for your past contribution to HuffPost. We are sincerely grateful for readers like you who help us ensure that we can keep our journalism free for everyone.
The stakes are high this year, and our 2024 coverage could use continued support. Would you consider becoming a regular HuffPost contributor?
Dear HuffPost Reader
Thank you for your past contribution to HuffPost. We are sincerely grateful for readers like you who help us ensure that we can keep our journalism free for everyone.
The stakes are high this year, and our 2024 coverage could use continued support. If circumstances have changed since you last contributed, we hope you'll consider contributing to HuffPost once more.
Support HuffPost Already contributed? Log in to hide these messages.