Montana businessman Tim Sheehy built his aerial firefighting company, Bridger Aerospace, on certain scientific realities namely that global climate change is real and driving more extreme wildfires. He even touted it as a leader in the fight against planet-warming emissions.

But when it came time to campaign for the U.S. Senate, the GOP hopeful quickly embraced partisan talking points on climate, repeatedly railing against what he calls the climate cult and radical environmentalists, while blaming the growing wildfire threat exclusively on forest mismanagement.

And while the Trump-endorsed MAGA conservative flipped his script on climate, his company continues to embrace climate and wildfire science at least in public filings.

In its latest annual report to the Securities and Exchange Commission, filed in March, Bridger Aerospace writes that we believe that rising global temperatures have been, and in the future are expected to be, one factor contributing to increasing rates and severity of wildfires. It cites climate research, including an Environmental Protection Agency website that notes multiple studies have found that climate change has already led to an increase in wildfire season length, wildfire frequency, and burned area. And it warns shareholders and potential investors that climate change poses numerous risks to the company.

The potential physical effects of climate change, such as increased frequency and severity of storms, floods, fires, fog, mist, freezing conditions, sea-level rise, and other climate-related events, could affect our operations, infrastructure, and financial results, the document states.

Further, we have been studying the potential effects of climate change (increased severity and frequency of storm events, sea level rise, land subsidence, change in temperature extremes, changes in precipitation patterns and drought, and wildfire) on Bridgers assets, operations and services, and we are developing adaptation plans to set forth a strategy for those events and conditions that we believe are most significant, it continues. Consequences of these climate-driven events may vary widely and could include increased stress on our services due to new patterns of demand, physical damage to our fleet and infrastructure, higher operational costs and an increase in the number [of] requests for our services. In addition, we could incur substantial costs to repair or replace aircraft and facilities.