ayodhya

A lawyer for the Muslim parties in the case said that various parties and the apex court registry had raised objection to the filing of the written note in sealed cover.
The Supreme Court-appointed mediation panel submitted its report in a sealed cover.
The judgment in the matter is to be pronounced by November 17.
High drama ensued as Rajiv Dhavan, the senior advocate representing the Muslim parties, tore up a pictoral map in court.
A 5-judge Constitution bench headed by Chief Justice Ranjan Gogoi said no more time will be granted to parties in the Ram Janmbhoomi-Babri Masjid case.
Section 144 was imposed between October 12 and December 10, in light of the SC verdict, Diwali and the anniversary of the Babri Masjid demolition.
The judgment in the matter is to be pronounced by November 17, the day the Chief Justice of India will demit the office.
Senior advocate Rajeev Dhavan, appearing for Muslim parties said as per a report by the Archaeological Survey of India, there is no conclusive proof.
Ayodhya became the top trend on Twitter on Monday afternoon, with many criticizing the top court for prioritising the Ayodhya hearing over the Kashmir petitions.
There was speculation that Prime Minister Narendra Modi aimed this dig at BJP's ally Shiv Sena.