Oh Gee, Another Terrible Consequence Of Antibiotics In Farm Animals | HuffPost - Action News
Home WebMail Tuesday, November 5, 2024, 04:03 AM | Calgary | 1.1°C | Regions Advertise Login | Our platform is in maintenance mode. Some URLs may not be available. |
  • No news available at this time.
Posted: 2016-05-25T17:40:10Z | Updated: 2016-05-25T19:39:38Z Oh Gee, Another Terrible Consequence Of Antibiotics In Farm Animals | HuffPost

Oh Gee, Another Terrible Consequence Of Antibiotics In Farm Animals

You know, because the rise of superbugs wasn't enough.
|
Open Image Modal
Feeding cattle antibiotics could be contributing to climate change, a new study suggests.
chameleonseye via Getty Images

In case you weren’t already convinced that overuse of antibiotics in livestock is a bad , bad , bad idea — a recent study offers a new reason to scale back on them: climate change.

An international research team found that dung from cattle treated with a commonly used antibiotic gave off a little less than double the amount of methane of antibiotic-free dung. Their work was published Thursday in the science journal Proceedings Of the Royal Society B.

Scientists tested dung from 10 cows. Five of the cows received a three-day course of broad-spectrum antibiotic tetracycline, and five received none, Phys.org reports . Researchers then measured the dung's outputs of carbon dioxide, methane and nitrous oxide, and found that the antibiotic course “consistently increased methane emissions.” Right now, the researchers aren’t sure exactly why the antibiotics have this effect. 

Scientists also found that the antibiotics changed the types of microorganisms living within dung beetles that fed on the dung. That finding is important because it indicates that giving livestock antibiotics can affect other wildlife and not just the "target animal," lead author Tobin Hammer told The Huffington Post in an email.

“In this case, dung beetle size and numbers were not affected -- which is good, because these beetles are ecologically important,” Hammer said. However, it’s possible the drugs could influence the beetles in other ways that researchers didn’t examine, like behavior. He added that more work is needed to determine the various ways that different types of antibiotics could affect different animal species. 

The new research comes after decades of experts warning that mass antibiotic use in livestock can and does lead to “superbugs” — bacteria that are totally resistant to antibiotics. As early as 1976, a Tufts University researcher found that when chickens received tetracycline, both the chickens and the farm workers handling them developed tetracycline-resistant bacteria within only a week.

Open Image Modal
A hen on a California egg farm.
Mike Blake / Reuters

One reason antibiotics are such a problem in livestock is because some farmers don’t just using them to treat individual sick animals. They also routinely give large numbers of animals low doses of antibiotics in an attempt to keep them from getting sick in the first place.

And some farmers also use antibiotics “subtherapeutically,” meaning that they give all their animals low doses of antibiotics because doing so makes the animals grow faster. (It's not totally clear why this works.) The FDA is in the process of phasing out the use of “medically important” drugs for this purpose in the United States. However, the overuse of antibiotics in livestock worldwide is rising as countries like China shift to more large-scale farms.

And while superbugs are the primary reason people have traditionally been concerned about antibiotic overuse, the issue of antibiotics is also linked to animal welfare.

Open Image Modal
Pigs on an industrial farm in Germany.
ullstein bild via Getty Images

“Many of these antibiotics are regularly used on animals that are not sick in order to speed up their growth or to prevent disease caused by overcrowded and unsanitary living conditions,” Rebecca Spector of the Center for Food Safety told Modern Farmer.

In other words, the reason these animals are so susceptible to illness in the first place is because they live in intensively confined , dirty, and highly stressful environments.

Correction: A previous version of this article said dung from antibiotic-fed cows gave off more than double the amount of methane. It was actually slightly less than double the amount.

Your Support Has Never Been More Critical

Other news outlets have retreated behind paywalls. At HuffPost, we believe journalism should be free for everyone.

Would you help us provide essential information to our readers during this critical time? We can't do it without you.

Support HuffPost