Home WebMail Friday, November 1, 2024, 10:39 AM | Calgary | -5.1°C | Regions Advertise Login | Our platform is in maintenance mode. Some URLs may not be available. |
Posted: 2016-03-03T23:07:19Z | Updated: 2016-03-03T23:07:19Z Our Long National Deflategate Nightmare Is Back With A Vengeance | HuffPost

Our Long National Deflategate Nightmare Is Back With A Vengeance

NOOOOOOO.
Open Image Modal
Spencer Platt via Getty Images

The Deflategate scandal has turned into a war of attrition. Thirteen months after Tom Brady may or may not have directed equipment managers to let the air out of 11 footballs , roughly 10 months after Roger Goodell slapped the quarterback with a four-game suspension for his involvement in the incident and six months after that suspension was vacated by an appeals court, the NFL and Brady's legal teams went head-to-head once more on Thursday, this time in front of three judges representing the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit in New York.

The sides were battling over that same quarter-season suspension, and whether Goodell had the legal power to dole out that punishment.

And while the judiciary ruling may not be handed down for months yet, the consensus from those present in the courtroom was that the NFL was the side that gained yardage on Thursday afternoon. 

While many have previously described Judge Richard Berman, the man who shelved Brady’s original suspension, as “star struck” in the presence of the quarterback, the three judges that presided on Thursday were anything but deferential.

According to reports, the judges on Thursday remarked time and time again just how suspicious it was that Brady destroyed the cell phone used to communicate with the equipment team before that fateful AFC title game, with Judge Barrington Parker Jr. declaring that Brady’s rationalization of the matter “made no sense whatsoever. ” (Last year Brady reportedly told Goodell that he “routinely destroys ” his cell phones for “security reasons .”) And Judge Denny Chin threw another punch when he asserted that “the evidence of ball tampering is compelling if not overwhelming ."

With the trio of judges alive and kicking, Brady’s team found itself in a surprisingly deep hole surprisingly early in the hearing. And unfortunately for Brady, the subsequent cross-examination of NFLPA attorney Jeffrey Kessler did nothing to help matters, as the “withering ” and “dramatic ” round of questioning led Kessler to become argumentative and lose his footing, per ESPN’s Sal Paolantonio and Andrew Brandt.

Boston Globe beat writer Ben Volin tweeted that Kessler got “hammered ” and “crushed ” by the judges when he stepped onto the stand. ESPN said that “judging from the tea leaves ,” the cross “seemed like a win” for the league.

No one knows exactly when the judges will announce their decision or exactly what that ruling will be, but in a case with as many zigs and zags as the Patriots’ playbook, there may be no better description for what Brady’s team is feeling after Thursday’s hearing than “deflating."

Your Support Has Never Been More Critical

Other news outlets have retreated behind paywalls. At HuffPost, we believe journalism should be free for everyone.

Would you help us provide essential information to our readers during this critical time? We can't do it without you.

Support HuffPost