Elizabeth Warren Demolishes Arguments Against Filling Scalias Supreme Court Seat | HuffPost - Action News
Home WebMail Monday, November 4, 2024, 10:50 PM | Calgary | 4.4°C | Regions Advertise Login | Our platform is in maintenance mode. Some URLs may not be available. |
Posted: 2016-02-14T18:26:59Z | Updated: 2016-02-14T18:28:20Z Elizabeth Warren Demolishes Arguments Against Filling Scalias Supreme Court Seat | HuffPost

Elizabeth Warren Demolishes Arguments Against Filling Scalias Supreme Court Seat

It's the Constitution, stupid.
Open Image Modal
Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) dismissed claims that seating a Supreme Court justice in President Obama's last year in office would be undemocratic.
Anadolu Agency/Getty Images

Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) eviscerated the main conservative argument against filling Antonin Scalia’s Supreme Court seat during President Barack Obama’s last year in office.

Warren, an acclaimed legal scholar, explained in a viral Facebook post  that since the American people re-elected Obama in 2012, his power to nominate a replacement has already been approved by the voters.

Warren referred to Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell's (R-Ky.) claim that it would be undemocratic to seat an Obama nominee in the president’s last year. McConnell "is right that the American people should have a voice in the selection of the next Supreme Court justice,” Warren wrote. “In fact, they did -- when President Obama won the 2012 election by five million votes.”

The clause in the constitution empowering the president to name Supreme Court justices -- Article II, Section 2 -- does not include an exception for when the president only has one year left in office, Warren noted.

Of course, McConnell himself has acknowledged as much in the past, since he voted to confirm Supreme Court Justice Anthony Kennedy in 1988, the last year of Reagan’s presidency.

Warren’s post had been shared more than 75,000 times as of noon on Sunday.

Also on HuffPost:

Your Support Has Never Been More Critical

Other news outlets have retreated behind paywalls. At HuffPost, we believe journalism should be free for everyone.

Would you help us provide essential information to our readers during this critical time? We can't do it without you.

Support HuffPost