Home WebMail Friday, November 1, 2024, 05:20 AM | Calgary | -3.0°C | Regions Advertise Login | Our platform is in maintenance mode. Some URLs may not be available. |
Posted: 2019-04-25T01:02:05Z | Updated: 2019-04-25T19:11:15Z Gun Safety Group Sues Over Alleged NRA Campaign Spending Violations | HuffPost

Gun Safety Group Sues Over Alleged NRA Campaign Spending Violations

The Giffords Law Center says the NRA illegally coordinated campaign spending with Republicans and the FEC failed to act on it.
|

The gun safety nonprofit Giffords Law Center filed a lawsuit against the Federal Election Commission on Wednesday for not acting on its multiple complaints that the National Rifle Association  made illegal campaign contributions to President Donald Trump and six other Republican candidates.

“Over the past nine months, Plaintiff Giffords filed four separate administrate complaints with the Federal Election Commission,” said the lawsuit , noting that the FEC has missed the deadline to respond to them.

The suit was filed by the Campaign Legal Center and the Giffords Law Center, which was created by former Arizona congresswoman and gun violence survivor Gabrielle Giffords . It accuses the NRA of using “a complex network of shell corporations to unlawfully coordinate expenditures with the campaigns of at least seven candidates for federal office, thereby making millions of dollars of illegal, unreported, and excessive in-kind contributions, including up to $25 million in illegal contributions to now President Donald J. Trump.”

The six other candidates the suit mentions are Sens. Thom Tillis (R-N.C.), Tom Cotton (R-Ark.), Cory Gardner (R-Colo.), Ron Johnson (R-Wis.), Josh Hawley (R-Mo.) and Montana’s Republican state auditor, Matt Rosendale.

The lawsuit claims there was illegal campaign spending in the 2014, 2016 and 2018 elections.

A political action committee cannot give more than $5,000 to a candidate in a single year, and in 2014, an individual couldn’t give more than $2,600 to a candidate (that amount went up to $2,700 in the 2016 and 2018 cycles). Yet federal campaign finance laws allow groups like NRA-PVF, a political action committee, to give an unlimited amount to outside groups — as long as they do not coordinate their spending with the candidates they endorse.

The lawsuit says consulting firms that placed the NRA’s ads also managed ads for those Republican candidates, as CNN first reported .

The lawsuit and complaints stem from information uncovered last year by The Trace , a digital news outlet focused on gun-related issues in America. The outlet also wrote last year about the complaints filed with the FEC against the NRA. Mother Jones also reported on the complaints. 

According to the lawsuit, the FEC missed a 120-day deadline to act on the Giffords Law Center’s complaints. The suit asks a federal judge to intervene and push the FEC to begin investigating the complaints.

“The FEC is supposed to be the nation’s election watchdog, but in this case it didn’t bite, bark, or even whimper,” Giffords counsel Adam Skaggs said in a statement. “Instead, it turned a blind eye while the NRA’s leadership made clear it’s more interested in handing bags of cash to candidates who will carry its water than following American laws or looking out for the interests of gun owners. In a desperate attempt to hold onto power and influence, NRA executives have flagrantly ignored our campaign finance laws and undermined the integrity of our election system.”

The lawsuit came just before Trump speaks at the NRA’s annual convention in Indianapolis on Friday. According to the nonpartisan Center for Responsive Politics, the NRA spent more than $30 million to boost Trump’s campaign and take down his Democratic rival Hillary Clinton, an amount that beats donations from any other independent outside group.

The FEC declined to comment to HuffPost on pending litigation, and the NRA did not immediately respond to requests for comment.

Read the lawsuit here:

This article has been updated to note reporting by The Trace and Mother Jones.

Your Support Has Never Been More Critical

Other news outlets have retreated behind paywalls. At HuffPost, we believe journalism should be free for everyone.

Would you help us provide essential information to our readers during this critical time? We can't do it without you.

Support HuffPost