In a swing district, Issa feels the heat, and sees the light

Darrell Issa is a really nasty Republican congressman from Californias 49th district, down in oh, so conservative Orange County, home to lots of retired military types. Hes a hatchet man who abuses his power to go after Democrats just for the hell of it. He bankrolled the recall of Gov. Gray Davis , and is also said to be the richest person in the Congress because he invented that noisy car alarm, the Viperhey, has it ever awoken you at night? Later, as Chairman of the House Oversight Committee, he was the inquisitor-in-chief of Hillary Clinton, a relentless Torquemada, who pursued, in the most vengeful way, her non-existent crimes, most notoriously Benghazi. In the most hyperbolic language imaginable, he called her a criminal involved in a criminal enterprise.

Never mind that Hillary was never found by a single investigative body to have done anything wrongnot Issas witch-hunting Oversight Committee, not the Federal Bureau of Investigation , not the State Department, and not the House Government Reform Committee, or the Judiciary Committee, or the Foreign Affairs Committee, or the Armed Services Committee, or the Intelligence Committee, or any of the Senate committees that investigated heryes, they all had hearings . Not that it mattered to the jail her wackos.

Issa hated Hillary, he hated Obama, and he was ambitious as hell, making him the poster boy of the conspiratorialist, angry white male wing of the Republican Party .

(By the way, do you know whom Issa made that Hillary is a criminal in a criminal enterprise crack to? None other Stephen K. Bannon, when the latter was a right wing talk show ranter at Breitbart.)

Well, the other day, Issas Republican constituents invited him to a town hall which, predictably, he was afraid to attend. So they held one anyway . Earlier that same day, however, Issa could not avoid encountering a smaller crowd, described in a local newspaper, the OC Weekly, as about 75 Trump enthusiasts. Do you suppose these pro-Trumpers were shouting their approval of the new President? Hardly. A huge crowd reaction burst out in response to this question: When are you going to investigate Trump and Russia? Trump and taxes? That was what was reported in the paper. In addition, I heard on T.V. a man ask Issa a very telling question. You spent millions on Benghazi, the angry man yelled. How about spending something on investigating Trumps ties to Russia?

Rep. Issa did not deign to reply to the Republicans who voted for him. But, within 48 hours, a most interesting thing occurred: Issa called for the appointment of a special Federal prosecutor to investigate Trumps ties to Putin and Russia.

Not only did Issa make that demand, he went a step further and directly implied that Trumps Attorney-General is unfit to lead such a probe. You cannot have somebody, a friend of mine, Jeff Sessions, who was on the campaign and is an appointee lead it.

What are we to make of this sudden turnaround? After all, Issa goes after Democrats, not his fellow Republicans. Well, to answer that, you need look no further than the 2016 election results, in which Issa was re-elected by the narrowest of margins , squeaking out a 50.3% to 49.7% victory. In this volatile political atmosphere, Democrats earlier this month announced a concerted effort to retire Issa next year, using an unprecedented DCCC investment in his district that will be used to hire full-time, local organizersto work with constituents.

Issa is feeling the heat. Although hes no longer chair of the House Oversight Committee, hes still a member of the Judiciary Committee, which perhaps not so coincidentally is in charge of the impeachment of Federal officials, including the President. We dont know what, if anything, went on between Trump, his people and Putin and his people. But until and unless theres a fair and unfettered investigation into the matter, well have to assume the worst. Its why more and more people are thinking that the reason Trump is waging war on the press is because hes trying to inoculate himself when the New York Times and CNN report the truth. Meanwhile, Trump, through Sean Spicer, is pushing back against the idea of a special prosecutor. For what? Spicer asked yesterday . For what? Because this President may have committed impeachable offenses.