Home WebMail Saturday, November 2, 2024, 05:34 AM | Calgary | -2.8°C | Regions Advertise Login | Our platform is in maintenance mode. Some URLs may not be available. |
Posted: 2015-12-18T20:36:56Z | Updated: 2017-01-04T20:36:46Z Your State Likely Can't Handle An Infectious Disease Outbreak | HuffPost Life

Your State Likely Can't Handle An Infectious Disease Outbreak

One year after Ebola left the U.S., most states don't focus enough on disease prevention.
|

Infectious diseases kill tens of thousands of Americans every year and add millions of dollars to municipalities' financial burden, but the majority of U.S. states are still not taking them seriously, a new report finds.

"The country does not sufficiently invest in basic protections that could help avoid significant numbers of outbreaks and save billions of dollars in unnecessary healthcare costs," the Trust for America's Health said in a report released this month.

In the report, the Trust evaluated individual states' ability to deal with unexpected diseases, using metrics such as childhood immunization and HIV-AIDS rates, and scored states on a 10-point scale.

Only 23 states scored above 5.

The highest-scoring states -- Delaware, Kentucky, Maine, New York and Virginia -- received an 8. The lowest -- Idaho, Kansas, Michigan, Ohio, Oklahoma, Oregon and Utah -- scored a 3.

Although 34 states and Washington, D.C. maintained or increased spending for public health between 2013 and 2015, only 18 states vaccinated at least half of their populations (aged 6 months or older) against the flu in the most recent flu season.

Some states still report measles outbreaks, even though the disease is fully preventable. Sixteen measles outbreaks in 2011 cost state and local public health institutions between $2.7 million and $5.3 million. Earlier this year, the first person in 12 years died from measles, in Washington state.

Many states are unprepared because public health departments are complacent and prioritize emergency care over long-term prevention, TFAH noted.

"This puts the nation at unnecessary risk when new threats emerge — like Ebola, MERS, a new strain of pandemic flu or new foodborne illness outbreak — and hampers the ability to tackle ongoing problems — like HIV, antibiotic-resistant infections or even the seasonal flu," the report says.

The Ebola epidemic that began in 2013 served as a reminder to governments around the world that disease prevention is paramount. Although hospitals across the U.S. are trying to prepare themselves for the next big outbreak, health care workers complain -- one year after the Ebola outbreak ended -- that they aren't receiving the proper infectious disease training despite the call for better preventive care.

TFAH recommends increasing federal funding to ensure that communities across the country have the "baseline capabilities" to contain infectious diseases. It suggests prioritizing prevention of antibiotic-resistant superbugs, Middle East Respiratory Syndrome, foodborne illnesses and HIV-AIDS. The group also recommends integrating clinical preventive practices to control infectious diseases into U.S. healthcare systems and incentivizing research devoted to the outbreak of new diseases.

Read the full report here .

Also on HuffPost:

Your Support Has Never Been More Critical

Other news outlets have retreated behind paywalls. At HuffPost, we believe journalism should be free for everyone.

Would you help us provide essential information to our readers during this critical time? We can't do it without you.

Support HuffPost

HuffPost Shoppings Best Finds

MORE IN LIFE