Home WebMail Saturday, November 2, 2024, 12:28 PM | Calgary | -0.8°C | Regions Advertise Login | Our platform is in maintenance mode. Some URLs may not be available. |
Posted: 2017-10-10T15:53:23Z | Updated: 2017-10-16T20:15:11Z Oppose the NFL Protests? You Probably Also Wouldve Opposed MLK | HuffPost

Oppose the NFL Protests? You Probably Also Wouldve Opposed MLK

Oppose the NFL Protests? You Probably Also Wouldve Opposed MLK
|
This post was published on the now-closed HuffPost Contributor platform. Contributors control their own work and posted freely to our site. If you need to flag this entry as abusive, send us an email.

To most Americans who oppose the NFL players kneeling during the National Anthem, their problem has nothing to do with race.

Its about the flag. Its about veterans. Its about respect.

Or so they say. And, in all honestly, they probably believe that.

The thing is, those opposing these NFL players fall in a long tradition of opposing civil rights protests.

Open Image Modal

Recent protests by NFL players have encountered significant uproar.

Wikimedia Commons

How is it, then, that many of the same people who say they oppose taking the knee would also say that they admire Martin Luther King, Jr.?

The answer is simple: had those people been around during the Civil Rights Movement last century, they probably wouldnt have supported MLK and his contemporaries.

Civil rights protesters have always fared better in hindsight than they have with their contemporaries. While MLK, for example, may be a fairly uncontroversial figure today, his approval rating was 32% positive and 63% negative in 1966.

In 1961, 61% of Americans disapproved of the Freedom Riders.

57% thought that sit-ins and freedom buses would do more to hurt than to help the Negro's chances of being integrated in the South.

On the eve of the March on Washington, 60% of Americans held an unfavorable view of the demonstration.

Yet, all of these events are today held widely in esteem. What, exactly, has changed?

In a sense, many things have changed. But the most important among them is time.

In hindsight, its easy to be on the side of justice.

Open Image Modal

Martin Luther King, Jr. may be popular now, but that wasnt always the case.

Wikimedia Commons

Its easy to wave off the allegation of being opposed to civil rights protests (and the NFL demonstrations were civil rights protests, at least before the media firestorm changed their focus), because this opposition would imply that you (the opponent) are racist. And only bad people, after all, are racist.

In our collective imagination, racists are fire-breathing, gun-wielding bogey-men who toss around racial slurs and loudly profess their racial superiority. This is certainly one iteration of racism, but it is not the only iteration of racism.

In fact, a much more prevalent form of racism comes in the version of the individual who claimsand truly believesnot to be racist.

Racism does not refer only to antagonistic beliefs and behavior, but also to beliefs and actions that produce and prolong injustice and inequality on a racial basis. These thoughts and actions do not have to be conscious, and you dont have to be evil incarnate in order to perform them. (Yes, this means manyif not allwhite people, including myself, hold some guilt here.)

Many opponents of the Civil Rights Movement did not envision themselves to be racist either. Many critics of MLK, for example, simply thought that the time wasnt right, his methods were too controversial, his actions unpatriotic.

If this sound familiar, its because they are some of the same criticisms being launched at Colin Kaepernick and other athletes who have used their national spotlights to protest injustice.

But lets rewind again. A 1966 survey found that 85% of white respondents felt that protests actions by black Americans would hurt the advancement of civil rights. A survey three years later found that 70% of black respondents approved of the same protest actions an overwhelming 85% of white respondents said would be harmful.

Looking back, its easy to feel that black respondents were right and that the white respondents were wrong. And surely we wouldve been in that righteous 15% of whites who didnt disapprove or would we?

Open Image Modal

Could it be that only time and hindsight separates us from them?

Wikimedia Commons

Its worth noting that attitudes toward the NFL protests vary by race as well. According to a CBS/YouGov poll , only 28% of white respondents approved of NFL players protesting by kneeling during the National Anthem. Conversely, 74% of black respondents approved.

The parallels we see in how Americans are responding to the NFL protests and how Americans responded to the Civil Rights Movement are more than uncanny, and the patterns tell us a story.

The upshot of all if this is, if you dont support the NFL players taking a stand now, you probably wouldnt have supported MLK and his contemporaries a half-century ago. And if youre upset that this makes it seem like youre a racist, theres really only one thing to tell you: it should.

Canton Winer is a freelance writer and a sociology Ph.D. student at UC Irvine. You can follow him on Twitter at @CantonWiner .

Your Support Has Never Been More Critical

Other news outlets have retreated behind paywalls. At HuffPost, we believe journalism should be free for everyone.

Would you help us provide essential information to our readers during this critical time? We can't do it without you.

Support HuffPost