Home | WebMail |

      Calgary | Regions | Local Traffic Report | Advertise on Action News | Contact

Posted: 2016-09-23T02:30:43Z | Updated: 2016-09-23T02:30:43Z No, NASA Didn't Change Your Zodiac Sign | HuffPost

No, NASA Didn't Change Your Zodiac Sign

Identity crisis averted.

After the internet freaked out over “changing” zodiac signs last week, NASA is setting the record straight.

In a Tumblr post  Monday, the space agency explained why no one should be having an identity crisis.

“Here at NASA, we study astronomy, not astrology,” the post reads. “We didn’t change any zodiac signs, we just did the math.”

The confusion stemmed from a slew of articles with headlines like, “Don’t Freak Out, But Your Star Sign Has Probably Changed ,” and, “Your Astrological Sign Just Changed, Thanks To NASA .”

Needless to say, people lost it.

The articles cited a page on NASA’s website that mentioned a 13th zodiac sign, Ophiuchus. The same webpage described how the positions of constellations have shifted, relative to the Earth, in the thousands of years since the Babylonians originally mapped out the zodiac.

According to NASA, these two tidbits are nothing new.

In its Tumblr post, NASA explains the origins of the zodiac, created more than 3,000 years ago. According to ancient Babylonian stories, the zodiac originally contained 13 constellations , including Ophiuchus. However, they chose only 12 constellations to fit their existing calendar , which had only 12 months.

“To make a tidy match with their 12-month calendar, the Babylonians ignored the fact that the sun actually moves through 13 constellations , not 12,” the NASA post explains. “Then they assigned each of those 12 constellations equal amounts of time.”

Meanwhile, the earth’s axis has changed position since Babylonian times, meaning it doesn’t point in the same direction it did 3,000 years ago.

Open Image Modal
See Ophiuchus in the top left?
NASA

While this explanation should clear up any remaining confusion, NASA stresses one major point: Astrology isn’t real science.

“No one has shown that astrology can be used to predict the future or describe what people are like based on their birth dates,” the post reads.

Though many people define themselves based on their star signs, wear astrological jewelry and read their horoscopes religiously, the zodiac is ultimately a human creation.

So, for every Taurus and Capricorn that questioned their identity in the midst of all this astrological hubbub, just remember: NASA doesn’t care about your star sign and you probably shouldn’t either.

Our 2024 Coverage Needs You

As Americans head to the polls in 2024, the very future of our country is at stake. At HuffPost, we believe that a free press is critical to creating well-informed voters. That's why our journalism is free for everyone, even though other newsrooms retreat behind expensive paywalls.

Our journalists will continue to cover the twists and turns during this historic presidential election. With your help, we'll bring you hard-hitting investigations, well-researched analysis and timely takes you can't find elsewhere. Reporting in this current political climate is a responsibility we do not take lightly, and we thank you for your support.

to keep our news free for all.

Support HuffPost

Before You Go

25 Gorgeous Images Captured By Hubble
(01 of25)
Open Image Modal
2014: Frontier Field Abell 2744Credit: NASA, ESA, and J. Lotz, M. Mountain, A. Koekemoer, and the HFF Team (STScI)

(Read about the image here .)
(credit:NASA)
(02 of25)
Open Image Modal
2013: Horsehead NebulaCredit: NASA, ESA, and the Hubble Heritage Team (STScI/AURA)

(Read about the image here .)
(credit:NASA)
(03 of25)
Open Image Modal
2012: Planetary Nebula NGC 5189Credit: NASA, ESA, and the Hubble Heritage Team (STScI/AURA)

(Read about the image here .)
(credit:NASA)
(04 of25)
Open Image Modal
2011: Interacting Galaxies Arp 273Credit: NASA, ESA, and the Hubble Heritage Team (STScI/AURA)

(Read about the image here .)
(credit:NASA)
(05 of25)
Open Image Modal
2010: Pillar and Jets in CarinaCredit: NASA, ESA, and M. Livio and the Hubble 20th Anniversary Team (STScI)

(Read about the image here .)
(credit:NASA)
(06 of25)
Open Image Modal
2009: Saturn Quadruple Moon TransitCredit: NASA, ESA, and the Hubble Heritage Team (STScI/AURA)

(Read about the image here .)
(credit:NASA)
(07 of25)
Open Image Modal
2008: Interacting Galaxy Arp 148Credit: NASA, ESA, the Hubble Heritage (STScI/AURA)-ESA/Hubble Collaboration, and A. Evans (University of Virginia, Charlottesville/NRAO/Stony Brook University)

(Read about the image here .)
(credit:NASA)
(08 of25)
Open Image Modal
2007: NGC 602Credit: NASA, ESA, and the Hubble Heritage Team (STScI/AURA) - ESA/Hubble Collaboration

(Read about the image here .)
(credit:NASA)
(09 of25)
Open Image Modal
2006: Orion NebulaCredit: NASA,ESA, M. Robberto (Space Telescope Science Institute/ESA) and the Hubble Space Telescope Orion Treasury Project Team

(Read about the image here .)
(credit:NASA)
(10 of25)
Open Image Modal
2005: Whirlpool Galaxy (M51)Credit: NASA, ESA, S. Beckwith (STScI), and The Hubble Heritage Team (STScI/AURA)

(Read about the image here .)
(credit:NASA)
(11 of25)
Open Image Modal
2004: Helix NebulaCredit: NASA, ESA, C.R. O'Dell (Vanderbilt University), M. Meixner and P. McCullough (STScI)

(Read about the image here .)
(credit:NASA)
(12 of25)
Open Image Modal
2003: V838 MonocerotisCredit: NASA, ESA and H.E. Bond (STScI)

(Read about the image here .)
(credit:NASA)
(13 of25)
Open Image Modal
2002: Tadpole GalaxyCredit: NASA, H. Ford (JHU), G. Illingworth (UCSC/LO), M.Clampin (STScI), G. Hartig (STScI), the ACS Science Team, and ESA

(Read about the image here .)
(credit:NASA)
(14 of25)
Open Image Modal
2001: Warped Edge-On Galaxy ESO 510-G13Image Credit: NASA and The Hubble Heritage Team (STScI/AURA), Acknowledgment: C. Conselice (U. Wisconsin/STScI)

(Read about the image here .)
(credit:NASA)
(15 of25)
Open Image Modal
2000: The Eskimo Nebula (NGC 2392)Credit: NASA, Andrew Fruchter and the ERO Team [Sylvia Baggett (STScI), Richard Hook (ST-ECF), Zoltan Levay (STScI)

(Read about the image here .)
(credit:NASA)
(16 of25)
Open Image Modal
1999: MarsCredit: Steve Lee (University of Colorado), Jim Bell (Cornell University), Mike Wolff (Space Science Institute), and NASA

(Read about the image here .)
(credit:NASA)
(17 of25)
Open Image Modal
1998: NGC 4314Credit: G. Fritz Benedict, Andrew Howell, Inger Jorgensen, David Chapell (University of Texas), Jeffery Kenney (Yale University), and Beverly J. Smith (CASA, University of Colorado), and NASA

(Read about the image here .)
(credit:NASA)
(18 of25)
Open Image Modal
1997: M84 Black Hole SignatureCredit: Gary Bower, Richard Green (NOAO), the STIS Instrument Definition Team, and NASA

(Read about the image here .)
(credit:NASA)
(19 of25)
Open Image Modal
1996: Hubble Deep FieldCredit: Robert Williams and the Hubble Deep Field Team (STScI) and NASA

(Read about the image here .)
(credit:NASA)
(20 of25)
Open Image Modal
1995: Eagle Nebula, M16Credit: NASA, ESA, STScI, J. Hester and P. Scowen (Arizona State University)

(Read about the image here .)
(credit:NASA)
(21 of25)
Open Image Modal
1994: Spiral Galaxy M100Credit: NASA, ESA, STScI

(Read about the image here .)
(credit:NASA)
(22 of25)
Open Image Modal
1993: Veil NebulaCredit: J.J. Hester (Arizona State University), and NASA

(Read about the image here .)
(credit:NASA)
(23 of25)
Open Image Modal
1992: Orion NebulaCredit: C.R. O'Dell (Rice University), and NASA

(Read about the image here .)
(credit:NASA)
(24 of25)
Open Image Modal
1991: NGC 4621Credit: Walter Jaffe/Leiden Observatory, Holland Ford/JHU/STScI, and NASA

(Read about the image here .)
(credit:NASA)
(25 of25)
Open Image Modal
1990: Supernova 1987A (SN 1987a)Credit: NASA, ESA, and STScI

(Read about the image here .)
(credit:NASA)