Home | WebMail |

      Calgary | Regions | Local Traffic Report | Advertise on Action News | Contact

Posted: 2016-02-22T20:36:35Z | Updated: 2016-02-22T20:36:35Z What Atticus Finch Taught Me About Feminism | HuffPost

What Atticus Finch Taught Me About Feminism

The iconic "To Kill a Mockingbird" character didnt conform to traditional ideals of masculinity.
Open Image Modal
Harper Lee's To Kill a Mockingbird was published in 1960, and awarded the Pulitzer Prize in 1961.
The Washington Post via Getty Images

The first time I ever picked up To Kill A Mockingbird, I was six years old and going through my mother's schoolbag. She was getting her Bachelor's degree at a Utah university and raising three young children entirely on her own. I looked at the soft lavender cover and asked her, confused, "Why are you reading a book about how to kill a mockingbird?She laughed, corrected me, and set it back down. 

A few years later I watched the book's film adaption. Aside from Scout waddling awkwardly in an amorphous ham costume, I remember one scene that, even as a young girl, would stay with me in ways that I'm only just beginning to understand:

Atticus, a single father defending a black man accused of raping a white woman, is confronted by a group of local bigots. His young son sits in the car, watching in horror as a man spits in his father's face for defending the man. I expected a quick and powerful punch to come next, a scuffle or some other kind of physical response in which Atticus -- The Good Guy -- would be a hero. Instead, Atticus slowly wipes the spit from his face with a handkerchief and joins his son in the car to drive home. 

It's a remarkable scene. It was even more remarkable to me given the male role models I had at that point in my life. As a Navy SEAL, my biological father's profession was the pinnacle of masculine ideals: guns, aggression, military savvy. Later, my stepdad would regale me and my siblings with stories about growing up in the sage brush of northern Nevada, where conflict was most frequently responded to with a balled fist against a row of teeth. While they made for good conversation, the identities of the two men who were integral to my upbringing seemed foreign and, frankly, intimidating.  

And so when I saw Atticus take a deep breath and turn his back to the potentially violent situation, I learned a lesson: I don't have to cheer on violence. I don't have to cheer on aggression. And other men don't have to, either. 

In Atticus, Harper Lee created a new "masculine," and through that character (and the other male role models in my life), I found feminism. Atticus instilled the idea of compassionate masculinity and compassionate courage in me. He raised his son and daughter as equals regardless of their genders, and throughout To Kill a Mockingbird, he led by empathetic example. He was a revelation for his insistence on nonviolent response, at one point telling his fiery daughter:  

You just hold your head high and keep those fists down. No matter what anybody says to you, don't you let 'em get your goat. Try fightin' with your head for a change.

Atticus helped me to see past aggression, and beyond the limits of traditional masculinity -- something the feminist movement encourages and embraces. Freeing men of "macho" expectations is an integral aspect of women's empowerment. Watching and reading Atticus parent made me appreciate that the men in my life were so much more than their grit, and the different kind of "grit" that it takes to be a father. 

And now I like to think that I have three fathers, all of whom are responsible for my growing up feminist: one northern Nevada escapee who raised me to read all the books so, like Scout, I could fight with my head; one devoting his post-military retirement to a charity for military service dogs, who taught me the singular beauty of self-forgiveness; and one who lives on forever through literature, fighting the good fight in the fictional town of Maycomb, Alabama.

Open Image Modal
Atticus and Jean Louise 'Scout' Finch, played by Gregory Peck and Mary Badham.
ASSOCIATED PRESS

Also on HuffPost: 

Banned Books
Sons and Lovers(01 of28)
Open Image Modal
According to Banned Books: Challenging our Freedom to Read: "In 1961 an Oklahoma City group called Mothers United for Decency hired a trailer, dubbed it "smutmobile," and displayed books deemed objectionable, including Lawrence's novel." (credit:Penguin Books)
Naked Lunch(02 of28)
Open Image Modal
Found to be obscene in Boston, MA Superior Court 1965-1966. (credit:Amazon)
The Naked and the Dead(03 of28)
Open Image Modal
Banned in Canada (1949) and Australia (1949). (credit:Amazon)
Tropic of Cancer(04 of28)
Open Image Modal
First banned from U.S. Customs in 1934 and Supreme Court found the novel not obscene thirty years later. The novel was also banned in Turkey in 1986. (credit:Amazon)
An American Tragedy(05 of28)
Open Image Modal
This classic was banned in Boston, MA (1927) and burned by the Nazis in Germany (1933) because it "deals with low love affairs." (credit:Amazon)
Women In Love(06 of28)
Open Image Modal
Two years after publication, the book was seized by John Summers of the New York Society for the Suppression of Vice and declared obscene (1922). (credit:Amazon)
The Great Gatsby(07 of28)
Open Image Modal
Challenged at the Baptist College in Charleston, SC (1987) because of "language and sexual references in the book." (credit:Penguin Books)
The Jungle(08 of28)
Open Image Modal
Banned in multiple countries including Yugoslavia (1929), East Germany (1956) & South Korea (1985) and burned in Nazi bonfires because of Sinclairs socialist views in 1933. (credit:Amazon)
Ulysses(09 of28)
Open Image Modal
Burned in the U.S. (1918), Ireland (1922), Canada (1922), England (1923) and banned in England (1929). (credit:Penguin Books)
In Cold Blood(10 of28)
Open Image Modal
According to Banned Books: The Right to Read: "Banned, but later reinstated after community protests at the Windsor Forest High School in Savannah, GA (2000). The controversy began in early 1999 when a parent complained about sex, violence, and profanity in the book that was part of an Advanced Placement English Class." (credit:Amazon)
The Absolutely True Diary of a Part-Time Indian(11 of28)
Open Image Modal
Coming in at #1 on the Top Challenged Books of 2014, for reasons including "anti-family, cultural insensitivity, drugs/alcohol/smoking, gambling, offensive language, sex education, sexually explicit, unsuited for age group, violence. Additional reasons: "depictions of bullying" (credit:Amazon)
Persepolis(12 of28)
Open Image Modal
#2 on the Top 10 Most Challenged Books of 2014 for reasons including "gambling, offensive language, political viewpoint." Additional reasons: 'politically, racially, and socially offensive,' 'graphic depictions' (credit:Amazon)
The Sun Also Rises(13 of28)
Open Image Modal
Banned in Boston, MA (1930), Ireland (1953), Riverside, CA (1960), San Jose, CA (1960). Burned in Nazi bonfires in Germany (1933). (credit:Amazon)
The Call of the Wild(14 of28)
Open Image Modal
Banned in Italy (1929), Yugoslavia (1929), and burned in Nazi bonfires (1933). (credit:Penguin Book)
All The King's Men(15 of28)
Open Image Modal
Challenged at the Dallas, TX Independent School District high school libraries (1974). (credit:Amazon)
The Lord of the Rings(16 of28)
Open Image Modal
In 2001, copies of The Lord of the Rings books and other Tolkien's novels were burned in Alamagordo, NM outside Christ Community Church being seen as "satanic". (credit:Amazon)
And Tango Makes Three(17 of28)
Open Image Modal
#3 on the Top 10 Challenged Books of 2014, on reasons including the book being "Anti-family, homosexuality, political viewpoint, religious viewpoint, unsuited for age group." Additional reasons: promotes the homosexual agenda" (credit:Amazon)
Lord of the Flies(18 of28)
Open Image Modal
First challenged in Dallas, TX Independent School District high school libraries in 1974. In 1981, the book was Challenged at the Owen, NC High School because the book is "demoralizing inasmuch as it implies that man is little more than an animal." In 1992, challenged because of profanity, lurid passages about sex, and statements defamatory to minorities, God, women and the disabled. The most recent challenge was in 2000 in Bloomfield, NY. (credit:Amazon)
1984(19 of28)
Open Image Modal
Challenged in the Jackson County, FL (1981) because Orwell's novel is "pro-communist and contained explicit sexual matter." (credit:Amazon)
Catch-22(20 of28)
Open Image Modal
Banned in Strongsville, OH (1972) for 4 years and challenged at the Dallas, TX & in Snoqualmie, WA (1979) because of its several references to women as "whores." (credit:Amazon)
Their Eyes Were Watching God(21 of28)
Open Image Modal
Challenged novel's language and sexual explicitness, but retained on the Stonewall Jackson High School's academically advanced reading list in Brentsville, VA (1997). (credit:Amazon)
Invisible Man(22 of28)
Open Image Modal
Text excerpts were banned in Butler, PA (1975). Removed from the high school English reading list in St. Francis, WI (1975). Two parents raised concerns about profanity and images of violence and sexuality in the book, but was retained in the Yakima, WA schools (1994) after a five-month dispute. (credit:Amazon)
Go Tell It on the Mountain(23 of28)
Open Image Modal
Challenged as required reading in the Hudson Falls, NY schools (1994) because "the book has recurring themes of rape, masturbation, violence, and degrading treatment of women." Challenged as a ninth-grade summer reading option in Prince William County, VA (1988) because the book is "rife with profanity and explicit sex." (credit:Amazon)
Beloved(24 of28)
Open Image Modal
Challenged in St. Augustine, FL in 1995 for the book being too violent. Other reasons for challenges to the book have been concerns over language & sexual material. The most recent case with the book was in 2007, when two parents asked that the book would be pulled from the AP English class in a Louisville, KY school because of inappropriate topics and the principal ordered the teachers to start over with The Scarlet Letter by Nathaniel Hawthorne. (credit:Amazon)
Lolita(25 of28)
Open Image Modal
Vladmir Nabokovs classic has been banned in the past in several countries in the 1950s, including France, England, Argentina, New Zealand and South Africa. The novel was also challenged in a Public Library in Florida in 2006 after claiming that the pedophilla and incest was unsuitable for minors. (credit:Amazon)
The Bluest Eye(26 of28)
Open Image Modal
Placed at #4 on the most recent list of Top Challenged Books for reasons including that the book was "sexually explicit", "unsuited for age group" & that it contains controversial issues (credit:Amazon)
A Farewell to Arms(27 of28)
Open Image Modal
Banned in Boston, MA and in Italy on the account of its painfully accurate account of the Italian retreat from Caporetto, Italy in 1929. It was also burned by the Nazis in 1933, banned in Ireland in 1939, and challenged in the Vernon-Verona-Sherill, NY School District (1980) as a "sex novel." (credit:Amazon)
One Flew Over The Cuckoo's Nest(28 of28)
Open Image Modal
In 1974, five residents of Strongsville, OH, sued the board of education to remove the novel. Labeling it "pornographic," they charged the novel "glorifies criminal activity, has a tendency to corrupt juveniles and contains descriptions of bestiality, bizarre violence, and torture, dismemberment, death, and human elimination." The book was also removed from public school libraries in New York and Oklahoma and challenged as part of curriculums of classes in Idaho, Washington & Massachusetts. The most recent challenge was in California in 2000, after complaints by parents stated that teachers "can choose the best books, but they keep choosing this garbage over and over again." (credit:Penguin Books)

Our 2024 Coverage Needs You

As Americans head to the polls in 2024, the very future of our country is at stake. At HuffPost, we believe that a free press is critical to creating well-informed voters. That's why our journalism is free for everyone, even though other newsrooms retreat behind expensive paywalls.

Our journalists will continue to cover the twists and turns during this historic presidential election. With your help, we'll bring you hard-hitting investigations, well-researched analysis and timely takes you can't find elsewhere. Reporting in this current political climate is a responsibility we do not take lightly, and we thank you for your support.

to keep our news free for all.

Support HuffPost